[bksvol-discuss] Re: validating books on podcasting
- From: "BlindGeek" <yakkoman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:32:10 -0800
I realize that. I just didn't know how to handle the figures in the book which
seem to be in a different font style which scans quite poorly while the rest of
the book scans wonderfully. No worries, I'll figure something out.
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike and Lori Castner
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 8:42 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: validating books on podcasting
There aren't many people with vision that have access to ARK files. It's a
better idea to submit in RTF format.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: BlindGeek
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 9:10 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] validating books on podcasting
I'm scanning and reading two books on podcasting: Podcasting for Dummies
(Tee Morris and Evo Terra), and Tricks of the POdcasting Masters (Robert Walsh
and Mur Lafferty). These books have a *lot* of diagrams, screen shots,
reprints of articles that scan horribly, and so on. I know there's not much to
be done about the diagrams, but the articles ... mainly in "Tricks." I'm
saving the exact-view with Openbook, but I know the preferred format is RTF.
If I submit the .ark file, is there anyone who has some sight who could use the
exact view to clean up the articles? The text isn't essential; after all, it's
not part of the main text, but I still think some people would ike to read it.
If not, I'm just leaving the FIgure captions in with a little notice saying
"[print edition]." Either way, both these books are envaluable for anyone
who's thinking of starting or already has a podcast.
Thanks for any help.
Other related posts:
