Peter, did you get a response to your questions? Charlie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Collingwood" <pj67coll@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 7:34 PM Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Newbie question regarding Hovatter > > Hi folks. I'm not exactly a noob but more of a lurker having been on the > list for some years without actively participating in Astronomy. I'm > hoping > I'll be able to change that within the next year. Right now I have a > question regarding the Hovatter Road site. North or South? Is there more > than one. > > My girlfriend has to make some constellation observations over a six hour > time period around new moon for the degree she's doing and I'm at a loss > as > to any decent place in Phoenix to make them. She's on the east side so I > was > considering the feasibility of heading out that way probably on a Sunday > night in a couple of weeks. I know of course that Friday and Saturday are > preferable but for logistical reasons we probably wouldn't be able to make > it on those nights. > > I've never been there and dont posess a GPS. Can anyone give precise > directions, or point to a website that has them? Also any comments on > safety > issues regarding the site as I assume on a Sunday night we'd probably be > alone. > > Is the site public land or is permission required and if so from whome? Or > does one have to be a member of a club to use it? > > Dont know if we'll manage to get out there but we need to try something. > Like I said it's for a course she's taking. > > I used to be a member of SAC and would like to rejoin and take up the > hobby > again. I'm hoping this might be a prelude to doing so. Any comments will > be > appreciated. Including if there are any sites closer to Phoenix out west? > > - Peter. > > > -- > See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please > send personal replies to the author, not the list. > > -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.