[AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- From: Michael Collins <cal_donley@xxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 21:31:27 -0700
To quote Mythbusters: Warning! Science Content
I posted a link yesterday to this plot of the separation between Mars
and the Moon over the span of a few hours Sunday:
<http://members.cox.net/f7j9jwirjsljejic/separation.jpg>
At the time, I mentioned that I was intrigued by but didn't know the
reason for the difference in slope before and after minimum separation.
Giving the question further consideration, I decided that it was most
likely the result of the changing point of observation over the time
period plotted, due to rotation of the Earth. To investigate further, I
expanded the range of the plot to cover a 48-hour period.
<http://members.cox.net/f7j9jwirjsljejic/separation_48t.jpg>
In this plot, the X-axis shows Julian date - 2454450.0. A bit more
interesting, and if you look carefully, you can see that there is some
sign of a one-day component in the shape of the curve (note the bend at
about 8.0 and again at about 9.0 on the X axis). To further test my
speculation, I plotted the same data in the geocentric rather than
topocentric reference frame.
<http://members.cox.net/f7j9jwirjsljejic/separation_48g.jpg>
Now the plot appears highly symmetrical, and I'm satisfied that I've
answered my question.
Now for anyone who hasn't moved on to other messages or gone to watch
a rerun of The Apprentice, you may be thinking, "Right, but what the
heck do geocentric and topocentric mean?" It's fairly simple, and
except in special cases, the difference is usually negligible. The
geocentric reference frame is that of a hypothetical observer located at
the Earth's center, whereas the topocentric frame relates to us ordinary
mortals at some particular point on the surface of the planet. Going
back to my first plot, it showed the separation between the Moon and
Mars as seen from my observatory a few kilometers southwest of Maricopa.
As I mentioned in the initial posting, there was an occultation of
Mars by the Moon for observers in the far north. The difference is
that, as seen from the Moon, the Earth subtends an angle of about two
degrees. Those two degrees are significant in the case of close
apparitions involving the Moon, as well as the occasional Earth-crossing
asteroid, spacecraft, etc.
As for the difference in slope in the original plot, as the Earth
rotates our vantage point changes by almost two degrees. This caused
the apparent separation to decrees faster than it increased following
closest approach Sunday evening.
-- Mike --
--
cal_donley@xxxxxxx
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- References:
- [AZ-Observing] Re: [EVAC] Janssen and Fabricius
- From: Fran
- [AZ-Observing] Mars and the Moon
- From: Jimmy Ray
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- From: sam
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- From: Michael Collins
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] Mars and the Moon
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- [AZ-Observing] Re: [EVAC] Janssen and Fabricius
- From: Fran
- [AZ-Observing] Mars and the Moon
- From: Jimmy Ray
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- From: sam
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Mars and the Moon
- From: Michael Collins