atw: Re: Time for another debate?
- From: Stuart Burnfield <slb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 20:56:23 +0800
This is typically the case with military manuals, I believe. I had to
write a manual whose headings had in effect been signed off on before I
started (possibly before I started shaving). The manual I wrote was a
software user guide but the outline I had to work with looked like it
was intended for a 1970s-style hardware operations manual. So three
quarters of the content had to be shoehorned under one heading, with the
rest scattered sparsely over dozens of mostly irrelevant (to this
project) headings.
It was a very enjoyable project but having to work to someone else's
exact list of headings was not something I'd like to do again.
Stuart
Brian Clarke said:
> I think chapter headings and other, apparently silly introductory
> words are often put there because that's what the client put
> in the contract as a deliverable,
**************************************************
To view the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes).
To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION modes) go
to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
Other related posts: