You haven't defined "win".
On Jan 23, 2016 11:23 AM, "William Claybaugh" <wclaybaugh2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Actually, it might be a race with billions in play: SpaceX has bet on a
just barely reusable solution; Blue is going with the cononical design for
high reuse solution. Blue is explicitly using sub-orbital as a test for
orbital. Who wins will matter in the short term...in the long run, Blue's
solution will win.
Bill
On Saturday, January 23, 2016, Rand Simberg <simberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
It's not really a race. They both want to achieve their business
objectives as soon as they can.
On 2016-01-22 21:15, Ken Biba wrote:
BLUE ORIGIN BEATS SPACEX TO RE-LAUNCHING A REUSABLE ROCKET
_From _Aerospace [1]_, a Flipboard topic_
Blue Origin just launched and landed its suborbital rocket New Shepard
— the same vehicle the company flew and then landed in November.
The…
READ IT ON FLIPBOARD
[2]
READ IT ON THEVERGE.COM
[3]
Ken Biba
Novarum, Inc.
415-577-5496
Links:
------
[1] http://flip.it/kIxeL
[2] http://flip.it/V_OvC
[3]
http://www.theverge.com/2016/1/22/10815800/blue-origin-rocket-launch-
