[argyllcms] Re: differen ColorMunkis
- From: Bob Coss <bobcoss@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 14:14:46 -0400
A couple of those devices discussed earlier are emissive only, and won't
make printer profiles. According to the supported devices list, those
operate like an i1 display type device.
Make sure you are getting one specifically for printers if you want that
functionality.
Bob
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Florian Höch <lists+argyllcms@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Am 02.10.2011 18:16, schrieb Lars-Daniel.Weber@xxxxxx:
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>>
>>> Datum: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 17:58:20 +0200
>>> Von: "Florian Höch"<lists+argyllcms@hoech.**org<lists%2Bargyllcms@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >
>>> An: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>
>> - ColorMunki Photo, ColorMunki Design. Same hardware, different
>>> bundled software.
>>>
>>
>> Isn't it more like "same software with different license"? I think, the
>> devices are acting like dongles?!
>>
>
> Not sure. Let's call it 'different functionality' (with the bundled
> software) then. With Argyll, there are no differences of course.
>
>
> They are all supported by Argyll CMS afaik (ColorMunki Display since the
>>> current version, 1.3.4).
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the information.
>>
>> I don't care about speed... Do you think, the quality of these devices is
>> okax for proofing?
>>
>
> I don't have one myself - yet - but, you can read all sorts of rather
> favorable stuff about them. They are definitely better as the predecessor
> (i1 Display 2) and even the DTP94 (although the latter may still have an
> edge when used with CRT displays afaik). If you're looking for a new
> colorimeter, I think there is currently no competition at that price point
> (this is only my personal opinion of course).
>
> --
> Florian Höch
>
>
>
--
Hay que aprender algo nuevo todos los días
Other related posts:
