[argyllcms] Re: XYZ LUT profile unable to be installed on Windows XP or used with Firefox 3.5
- From: Alexander <adfirestone@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:29:23 -0800
Hmm, I guess it is just Profile Maker 5 that creates ICC v2.4.0 Matrix
profiles with A2B and B2A tables. Any idea why they would do that?
Here is an example: http://www.mediafire.com/?e3nn113ohmw
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Alexander wrote:
>
>> Now that I realize what the problem is, any chance of adding an option
>> to include those Matrix profile tags to fall back on like other
>> programs do?
>>
>
> Possibly. I'll have to take a look at how difficult that is.
>
>
> As a somewhat related question, is there any reason why Argyll refuses
>> to make an ICC 2.4.0 Matrix profile (with A2B & B2A tables) like you
>> can with LUT profiles?
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean. By definition A2B and B2A tables are cLUT
> profiles, not matrix profiles. There can be only one "matrix profile"
> matrix, and it is always colorimetric intent, and is easily
> invertible to provide the PCS -> device conversion.
>
> Graeme Gill.
>
>
Other related posts:
