[argyllcms] Re: Segmentation fault
- From: Dimitrije <migraf015@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 13:55:28 +0100
I try to make profile with "-qm" and "-qh" and there is a difference.
with -qm is larger err
Profile check complete, peak err = 8.124194, avg err = 1.386176, RMS = 1.697672
and with -qh is smaller err also better quality
Profile check complete, peak err = 4.136766, avg err = 0.568436, RMS = 0.712158
Also when I was use -bu I got the best results, but error is the same, and Profile check depends only from -q option.
But the real quality is much better after I was use -bu, and the file was larger.
The best results what I've got is with this command
"colprof -v -D"R430_Migraf_04SwopUHigh" -bu -Zp -Tp -cmt -dpp -iD65 -SSWOPM18.icm -OR430_Migraf_04SwopUHigh.icm R430_Migraf_R3ps"
I just try to see is there any difference if I use -qu, but I giveup from that.
I wandering, does it need to last so long and Which number I should use wirh Performance comand so I can give a faster results?
I send the rest of file so you can try it.
On Feb 4, 2012, at 6:11 AM, Graeme Gill wrote: