On 9/10/07, Gerhard Fuernkranz <e> wrote: > > > > Where can I put the DeltaE 82.860992 that printread talks about in > > this landscape. > > Possibly you can ignore it. I suggest that you measure the suspect patch > with spotread again. And if the numbers you get are very close to the > numbers you got in the .ti3 file, then it is IMO OK to ignore it. > Thanks. I think I have a clue now about my main topic after all this e-mail. However I put on a question about spotread. When I read the F5 patch row with spotread afterwards. I got this results X Y Z Printread 35.186 18.810 1.2915 Spotread 34.793552 18.543380 1.277729 Can someone explain the differences here? I have been confused about this for a while. The results above are without fwa compensation. > (My understanding is, if you don't call targen with the "-c <profile>" > option, then the XYZ numbers in the .ti1 and .ti2 files are just a very > rough guess, which may not fit well with your printer's response at all, > so sporadically "unjustified complaints" from printread may happen for > some patches) > And for the reference I made my target without the -c option. Lars Tore Gustavsen