13 Feb 2014, 18:35 -06:00 Todd Sailor wrote: >todds-mac-pro:bin Todd$ ./colprof -v -qh -i D50 -o 1931_2 -S AdobeRGB1998.icc >-cmt -dpp -D"837 Kirkland 8x10 02-13-2014" -C"Copyright Todd Sailor 2014" a1 >This is normal parameters for RGB-device, except I'd not recommend the use of >AdobeRGB1998 as source space for gamut mapping. Not all of the images requires >full AdobeRGB gamut. But they would suffer from some compression from AdobeRGB >to printer gamut even if the images are inside the printer gamut. >Creating Gamut Mapping >Gamut Mapping Specification: >Description = 'p - Enhanced Saturation [ICC Perceptual]' Optimizing source to >destination mapping... >No og 319 max 2.439459 avg 0.180157, No ig 5932 max 5.030217 avg 0.587148, >avg rext -0.002049 "No ig 5932 max 5.030217" if I understood correct means the >compression of ~5 dE2000 in some colorspace region. >Profile check complete, peak err = 3.962292, avg err = 0.447221, RMS = 0.567234 Good. Adequate. Normal. Right. Show us: xicclu -v -fb -ir -pl -g a1.icc xicclu -v -fb -ip -pl -g a1.icc If the plots above are smooth the profile is good (takin in account low dE76). If the perceptual curves are not quite smooth there may be increasing of -r colprof parameter may required. But not likely for your device. It seems yours will be O.K. Take a look at: iccgamut -v -w -s a1.icc (VRML viewer is needed). Check dE2000: profcheck -k -x -w -e a1.ti3 a1.icc