[argyllcms] Re: Gamuts comparison

  • From: Marco Noldin <marconoldin@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:20:47 +0200

I have tried again but now the results seems in order, maybe the first time I made an error somewhere.

BTW it arise a question comparing the monitor and prophoto gamut: it overcomes the 100%, is it normal? (see attachment) 

Thank you
Marco



Il giorno 22/ago/2011, alle ore 23:45, Gerhard Fuernkranz ha scritto:

Am 21.08.2011 22:18, schrieb Marco Noldin:
Thank you for the answer. What I don't understand is the results whit absolute intent: why the intersect in sRGB is bigger than Adobe RGB?

> using the -i option with viewgam seems that sRGB can
> encode more colors than Adobe RGB (68% vs 62%).

Can you post the command lines and outputs of iccgamut and viewgam?

Do you interpret the numbers correctly?

Example:
$ viewgam -i sRGB.gam printer.gam out.wrl
Intersecting volume = 512354.4 cubic units
'sRGB.gam' volume = 833600.9 cubic units, intersect = 61.46%
'printer.gam' volume = 552445.5 cubic units, intersect = 92.74%

$ viewgam -i AdobeRGB1998.gam printer.gam out.wrl
Intersecting volume = 552205.4 cubic units
'AdobeRGB1998.gam' volume = 1209985.9 cubic units, intersect = 45.64%
'printer.gam' volume = 552445.5 cubic units, intersect = 99.96%
This means that
  • the printer can reproduce 61.46% of the sRGB gamut
  • the printer can reproduce 45.64% of the Adobe RGB gamut
  • sRGB can reproduce 92.74% of the printer's gamut
  • Adobe RGB can reproduce 99.96% of the printer's gamut
Regards,
Gerhard


Other related posts: