On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:40:54 +1100, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Tomas Svab wrote: >> I tried another profile with D50_2.0.sp. On screen in Photoshop's >> on-screen proof preview it looked more blue. The closest one was >> D50_0.0.sp. > > OK, try the attached spectrum. It should have zero UV as far as the > FWA is concerned. Using the new spectrum the on-screen proof in Photoshop looked like paper with no whitener in it (maybe too neutral). However the print was bluer than the D50_0.0.sp and the reds were still off. My other profiles for yellowish washi paper and proofing paper (not much FWA) match between screen and print and they're more predictable. Just as a test I printed on the problem paper (Kokuyo) using a similar stock Epson paper profile. It looked better. So that must mean there is something wrong with my chart or measurements that didn't cause problems on other papers in the past. I'm going to check my EyeOne and entire process on a paper I've used before to rule out that something else went wrong other than this paper being hard to profile. If I find out anything meaningful I'll post my results. Tomas > >> However the prints all looked very similar and it was hard to see any >> significant difference. The print made with the D50_0.0.sp profile was >> possibly more blue. I understand more how the -f option changes the >> on-screen preview of the profile now. But the print doesn't change much. >> Is that the way it works or is my profile too far off to notice a >> difference? > > Sounds like there is some discrepancy between your preview and your print. > Perhaps you need to review and cross check your soft proof color > management. > Graeme Gill. -- ------------------------- Tomas Svab email celsius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx mobile 090-6664-2370 616-8171 Kyoto Kyoto-City 3-88 Uzumasa Aokigahara-cho, Ukyo-ku Japan 616-8171 京都市 右京区太秦青木ヶ原町3-88