[argyllcms] Re: Eye-One Scan Target 1.4 .cht and .Q60 files (was Re: Re: Hutchcolor targets)
- From: Ben Goren <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:15:02 -0700
On 2007 Aug 13, at 12:32 AM, Lars Tore Gustavsen wrote:
> The max difference is about DeltaE*ab at 10.3 on row 15 (if my
> awk script is correct). So I guess the story is either I
> have used sportread incorrectly, or this target really needs
> individual measuring.
Of course, it could just as easily be that *I* used spotread
incorrectly.
Have you tried profiling a scanner yet? I've gotten good results
with two scanners so far, my Epson and my mom's Canon -- but I've
hardly done any critical evaluation, just some quick eyeballing.
But I rather suspect that the fact that GretagMacbeth doesn't
include a reference file and instead has you create one yourself
means that *they* aren't confident in the color consistency of the
target.
For what it's worth, I did use FWA compensation. For the rest, I
hardly did anything special: I just used that plastic centering
doohickey, plopped the Eye-One down on top, and hit the key. The
worst part was finding an actual Q60 file to use as a template,
and then re-numbering the output from spotread to fit.
Cheers,
b&
Other related posts:
