Very interesting. Did you found those informations in a white paper? So from what I understand, Eizo did changed their internal display LUT from 1D LUTS to 3D LUTS. I do understand that Graeme don't want to spend time on ever changing proprietary technologies. :) thanks! Matthieu DUBAIL matthieu-dubail.com Paris, 4ème 2011/10/18 Sam Berry <samkberry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > It's also worth noting that regardless of gradation precision, in-monitor > gamut transformation requires linearisation, which means that the monitor > must know the input tone curve. A calibration done with LUTs before this > stage means that any linearisation performed can only be an approximation. > The calibration will also need to be redone for each gamut transformation > selection. > > It should also be noted that modern internal LUT monitors (inc Eizo now) > feature 3D LUTs which allow printer colour spaces to be emulated, and I am > not aware of any graphics card with similar features at this time. A well > specified tone curve is essential for this emulation to be meaningful, and > once you have monitor communication too specify it, you may as well use > internal LUTs too. > > Sam Berry > > > On 17 October 2011 16:03, Matthieu DUBAIL <matthieu.dubail@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> Thanks for the answer. >> Anyway, how usefull do you think internal display LUT are? Are they really >> superior o video card LUT ? Just wondering >> >> Matthieu DUBAIL >> matthieu-dubail.com >> Paris, 4ème >> >> >> >> 2011/10/11 Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> Matthieu DUBAIL wrote: >>> > I was wandering if Argyll can access to Eizo internal monitor LUT (Eizo >>> > CG211). If so, how? >>> >>> Hi, >>> no, Argyll doesn't access display LUTs. >>> >>> >>From what I read from the mailing list archives, it can't, but the post >>> was >>> > 2 years old. Any news? >>> >>> I don't have a Eizo to reverse engineer, so this is unlikely to change. >>> >>> Graeme Gill. >>> >>> >>> >> >