If Eizo are capable of supplying a monitor which will decently emulate some acceptable known color space, and supply a calibration method to make sure that the monitor doesn't drift, then the monitor is perfectly usable to me - I do understand that this is not perfectly "open" in the sense that recalibration may necessitate running Eizo's software, but it is perfectly compatible with an ICC workflow as the interface is ICC compliant. Edmund On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Matthieu DUBAIL wrote: > > Very interesting. Did you found those informations in a white paper? > > So from what I understand, Eizo did changed their internal display LUT > from > > 1D LUTS to 3D LUTS. I do understand that Graeme don't want to spend time > on > > ever changing proprietary technologies. :) > > The aim of such 3D luts is different to general calibration and profiling - > it is for the display to be a complete color management system, where > it emulates various RGB color spaces. This is beyond the scope of Argyll > currently, and would end up being rather device and application specific. > > ICC profiles on the other hand form part of an open system that all > applications can participate in. > > Graeme Gill. > >