Hi, I've noticed this a while ago, but tested it properly just now: Whenever Windows loads (without any gamma-altering software starting automatically), or the gamma curves are reset via 3-party software, the resulting curves prove to have a small discrepancy with what Argyll seems to reset to. I've tested this with 'dispwin.exe -V' and specifying an icm profile without a vcgt tag, and it shows a 0.4% discrepancy. When gamma has been reset with 'dispwin.exe -c', the discrepancy is 0.0%, just like it should be. Right now this can be bypassed by using the -C parameter and some commandline software, like xcalib, to reset the gamma before each patch to the 'Windows default'. I've tested it and there might be some difference in the resulting calibration, or it just might be my imagination. Well, the main question is how come Argyll's and Windows' default gamma curves are different? Also, what can be done about it, or should anything be done? How does this affect the overall calibration and profiling processes? Thank you. Ivan