[amayausers] Re: Color display error in Amaya OS v5.07.043
- From: Mike Garber <agraphic2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:55:24 -0700
Rod and Sharon,
I'm on my 2nd box of Neb plastic sided bobbins and have had very good
luck. I don't seem to have to adjust the tension after each bobbin
change....saves time.
Mike
Rod or Sharon wrote:
>I monitor another embroidery list (different machine) and wanted to share
>with you a post--we use Neb
>bobbins (plastic sided) and love them. Just wanted any input from the rest
>of the group
>on the comment below:
>Sharon
>
>Recently I did a test on 3 different types of Bobbins on a new 6hd M-Series
>machine. The three Bobbins were Magnetic, Coates Trusew Poly (132 yards),
>and
>some Plastic Sided bobbins. First thing I would like to state is that
>tension
>has a lot to do with how your bobbins run. What I did notice is that with
>the
>plastic sided bobbins your tension has to be pretty close to perfect, there
>is
>little room for the tensions to be off. I did notice there were definitely
>more
>thread breaks with the plastic sided bobbins as well. The Coates and
>Magnetic
>Bobbins ran a lot smoother and the consistency was very close with maybe a
>little advantage for the Magnetic but not a noticeable difference.
>
>This is what got me. Out of all the runs I did the plastic bobbins
>(30-35,000
>stitches) ran out first and then the magnetic bobbins (50-55,000 stitches)
>and
>then the Coates (55-60,000 stitches). Even though the Coates had less yards
>(3
>yards per bobbin to be exact) of bobbin than the magnetic bobbins, they
>still
>lasted longer (I even had a Coates bobbin last over 62,000 stitches). This
>was
>the same on all the runs I did while switching the bobbins to different
>heads
>for each run. Of course I was able to run all 3 types of bobbins to the core
>because of the bobbin sensors however, on the plastic sided bobbins I did
>see
>some inconsistencies on some but no all in the winding of the bobbin when it
>got lower into the bobbin.
>
>My conclusion, Coates 132 yard bobbins seem to work the best for the money.
>Even though the magnetic bobbins ran just as good, they did not last as long
>and only come 100 to a box (with no sides so the do unravel some) as opposed
>to
>144 in a box you get from Coates. So I figure by using the Coates 132 yard
>bobbins you will get roughly about 2,920,000 more stitches per box over the
>magnetic bobbins (100 x 5000 plus 44 x 55,000) which appears to be the
>best
>bang for your buck....
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
