[adtools] Re: -use-dynld - Why was it added?
- From: Hans-Joerg Frieden <Hans-JoergF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: adtools@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:22:01 +0200
On 05.08.2010 00:28, Trevor Scroggins wrote:
Sounds reasonable. Did we rename libgcc_s.so to libgcc.so to provide a
shared libgcc that "just works" (unless you're using libtool) without
having to understand gcc's link specs, or was there more to it than
that?
To be honest, I don't know. I don't think I have done anything like that
in any GCC I built, but then, I don't know whether it included a
libgcc.so at all.
Regards,
--
Hans-Joerg Frieden
Now these points of data make a beautiful line,
and we're out of beta, we're releasing on time.
--
______________________________________________________________________________
Amiga Development tools ML - //www.freelists.org/list/adtools
Homepage...................: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/adtools
Listserver help............: mailto:adtools-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=HELP
Other related posts:
