[access-uk] Re: TEXTING WITH TALKS
- From: "Mark Matthews" <mark.matthews53@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 21:43:41 +0100
I think Text sometimes is considered to be more convenient, and perhaps a
little less obtrusive. Also there's the cost to take into account.
Just my thoughts.
Cheers,
Mark
Mark Matthews
Cardiff, Wales, UK
E-mail:mark.matthews53@xxxxxxxxxxxx
MSN/Windows Messenger:markmatthews3@xxxxxxxxxxx
Skype:mmatthews1981
Webpage:http://www.qsl.net/gw0wgk
-----Original Message-----
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Ray's Home
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 8:44 PM
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Re: TEXTING WITH TALKS
Hi. I don't want to detract the practical help being given on texting and
Talks, and it may well be I'm missing something here, but what's the actual
advantage of texting, over say leaving a voice message? I am inclined to
think the latter is much more personal, and a damned sight easier. On
T-Mobile I pick up voice messages free; think the sender gets flieced a bit
though.
So, what's the deal? It must be more than its 'cool'.
Ray
Personal emails: Email me at
mailto:ray-48@xxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve <mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Nutt uk] Re: TEXTING WITH TALKS
Hi Ian,
In my view, your blind friend is right. Once you get used to it, you will
probably never want to turn it off again, but it does take some getting used
to at first. But persevere with it, and it saves time, certainly.
All the best
--
Computer Room Services: the long cane for blind computer users.
Telephone Voice: +44(0)1438 742286, Fax/BBS: +44(0)1438 759589
mobile: +44(0)7956 334938,
Email: Steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web site: http://www.comproom.co.uk <http://www.comproom.co.uk/>
_____
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Ian Macrae
Sent: 14 July 2005 11:21
Hi all,
I'm curious to know whether Vis prefer to use predictive texting or not when
using Talks enabled phones. Personally I don't use it at all but I have a
blind friend who swears by it claiming that it's much faster. Any thoughts?
Cheers now.
Ian
http://www.bbc.co.uk/
Other related posts:
