It's my understanding that we're going to try and track based upon a location for a given camera, and not on distance. for the time being i'm going to remove the distance mentioned -- if we can get this, and can use it, then we'll add it back. On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Chris Rodgers <Rodger4@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hey Logen, > > Here it is. I highlighted two things in my section since I referenced > section numbers. If you are going to change them, I wanted to point out > that you would have to change them there too. > > I did highlight an issue on the first page where "Distance" is mentioned. > David Busch's recent e-mail to everyone (and to me separately) makes it > sound as though we probably won't be getting that. (actually, it sounds > like we'll be happy to get the speed!) > > I just hightlighted that one thing, but it might end up being a broader > issue than that. I don't know everything that David had in his e-mail. > > Let me know if you have any issues you need me to address. > > -Chris > > On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:38:34 -0400, Swati Saxena <ssaxena@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I have integrated everyone's changes except yours and Logen. >> Chris,Please make your changes and submit it to Logen. >> Once Logen gets it, i guess he can implement his own changes before >> submitting. >> >> Also i havent recieved yours and Logen's Weekly reports. >> >> Thanks >> Swati >> > >