... It just occurred to me that Wittgenstein on Aesthetics is not really about "aesthetics" per se. It's actually Wittgenstein on "judgment." And it seems to me that it is closely related to Wittgenstein's "seeing as" and "imponderable evidence" (e.g., knowing the intuitions and feelings of others). In other words, what I am trying to say is that anyone who reads his lectures on Aesthetics as being about art is misunderstanding them. The lectures are more broadly about a kind of COGNITION that routinely goes on in our lives for certain subjects and context. We might call it the learning of a "refined judgment," or the development of "exquisite taste" -- but it is related to all sorts of judgments we make in life, such as understanding our children (imponderable evidence). One wants to say, Aesthetics is about a particular kind of brain task present in the appreciation of art, but not at all limited to that domain. In fact, those who see the remarks on aesthetics as being on a desert island of some sort are really missing the boat. Yours inspired today, Dr. Sean Wilson, Esq. Assistant Professor Wright State University Personal Website: http://seanwilson.org SSRN papers: http://ssrn.com/author=596860 Discussion Group: http://seanwilson.org/wittgenstein.discussion.html ========================================= Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/