--- On Mon, 5/24/10, SWM <wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [Dennett] is not interested in eliminating ordinary references to > subjective experience or in denying that we have subjective > experience. His point is to explain the occurrence of such > experiences by reference to something more basic (something > constitutive, to use a term that has recently gained some > cachet heree!) which is not, itself, experience, > subjectiveness, etc. Dennett's effort to explain subjective experience in terms of something "more basic" amounts to complete nonsense, as anyone with basic subjective experience knows. -gts ========================================== Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/