[Wittrs] Consciousness in Three Lists

  • From: "SWM" <SWMirsky@xxxxxxx>
  • To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 13:09:37 -0000

In response to Joe, here is one version of the processes/functions I suggest 
would need to be in place for a more robust CR to actually achieve 
understanding (as in the kind of understanding we recognize in ourselves). The 
full listing, with some responses to it, will be found on the list to which the 
link I have included takes you:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/16330

CONSCIOUSNESS IN THREE LISTS


List # 1: FEATURES FOUND IN HUMAN TYPE CONSCIOUSNESS (all of which may need to 
be present and integrated [working together] for consciousness to be said to 
have occurred).*


1) Intentionality (aboutness, i.e., the general capacity to relate
representations to things)

2) Comprehension/Apprehension (recognizing and imputing meaning to things, 
i.e., making particular connections between symbols and objects -- or, another 
way of saying it, associating representations with other kinds of 
representations as relating symbols and images of various types [mental or 
actual])

3) Awareness (recognizing distinction[s] between Self and Other[s])


* It's possible that there is a great deal of overlap between these three 
functionalities and that, indeed, we may need all three to have any one of them.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

List #2 FUNCTIONS WHICH MUST BE PERFORMED AS A BASIS FOR THE ABOVE:


1) Perception (capturing information about the world)

2) Thinking (generating/using representations)

3) Believing (making and retaining valuational distinctions, including, but not 
limited to, distinguishing true from false, good from bad, etc.)

5) Remembering (retrieving past representations and making relational
connections -- that is, retrieving alone is not remembering)

6) Picturing (placing particular representations into various larger
representations based on identified relational factors -- perhaps better 
understood as mapping, including many levels of tiered and interconnected maps 
of various aspects of the inner and outer "worlds" of the entity)

7) Projecting (thinking ahead, i.e., recognizing temporal distinctions and 
placing representations in different loci on one or more temporal map/pictures)*

* This last seems to correspond somewhat to Eray's insistence on the
significance of "planning". (Does it support the function of intentionality as 
he suggests? I'm not sure, but certainly it is the functions found on this 
level, as a group, that enable the higher level functions in list #1 to occur.)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

List # 3: BASIC PROCESSES/SYSTEMS/PERFORMANCE HARDWARE NEEDED TO ACHIEVE THE 
HIGHER LEVEL FUNCTIONS ABOVE:


1) Information Collection (apparatus and sub-systems to bring various kinds of 
data into the entity)

2) Information Breakdown (sub-systems to analyze, synthesize, associate, i.e., 
establish relational connections between inputted information)

3) Information Representation (sub-systems to convert one kind of data element 
to others, e.g., replacing different kinds of received raw signals with 
images/symbols for ease of use and retrieval at other levels)

4) Information Transfer (sub-systems for passing information, in whole or part, 
between other systems)

5) Information Storage (sub-systems to capture and hold the information in 
various forms awaiting retrieval)

6) Information Retrieval (sub-systems to pull out and return to useable status 
stored information)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

General Note 1: It's the second list that would appear to be of most interest 
in any effort to construct a synthetic consciousness because the third and last 
list is largely basic and computational while the first is the one that's 
mysterious and whose occurrence we want to explain and then make happen.

General Note 2: There would, in a consciousness like us, probably need to be at 
least one subsystem separated from the rest to form and constitute the agential 
self and this may require a somewhat different and parallel system "tree" 
though rooted in the same foundation as represented by list #3. It's not clear 
though how far up the tree formed by these three tiers the branch off would 
need to be. Maybe above #2 but below #1.


=========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/

Other related posts: