Hello, can anybody help clarify an issue for me. I have examined the eeg of a number of children with ADHD and quite a few show a high (ie greater than 4) theta/beta ratio at CZ. This is when theta is defined as 4-8hz and beta as 13-21hz, as per Monastra's procedure etc. However, when i look at the theta at CZ what i 'think' i'm seeing is really slow alpha. That is, its peaking around 7.2-7.5Hz, it attenuates when eyes are open relative to closed, and there is only the one peak. Its not like this is a theta peak and there is also an alpha peak. My concern is that strictly speaking, if one were to adhere to the numbers, this patient exhibits an extremely high theta/beta ratio and as such could benefit from neurofeedback aimed at reducing theta and enhancing beta. However, i think that what is really the case is that the patient shows a slightly slow alpha peak, which could be a result of the age of the child, and may just speed up with age. In addition, if one takes Klimesch's view and identifies the 'individual alpha frequency' +/- 2hz this peak would without doubt be within the individual alpha range. As such the only neurofeedback that would seem appropriate would be to focus on speeding up alpha. I suppose my question is really this: A wide range of literature suggests that some children with ADHD may exhibit an excess of theta and a deficit of beta making neurofeedback a therapeutic option, however is this true Theta or is it slow alpha? Either way what would you recommend? As usual any comments etc would be gratefully received david David J Vernon PhD Dept. of Cognitive Neuroscience & Behaviour Imperial College London St Dunstan's Road London W6 8RP Tel: 44 (0) 208 383 0584 Fax: 44 (0) 208 846 1670 -----Original Message----- From: Joe Siri Ekgren [mailto:vennskap@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: 09 April 2003 19:16 To: wineeg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [wineeg] Latest version of WinEEG, solves time clock error Dear Listmembers, With the latest version of WinEEG, the software now records in real time on laptops with Win98. (Previous versions ran at half speed, i.e. a recording length of 60 WinEEG one second epochs took 160 seconds in real time under Win98). The screen gets more jumpy on my 500 Mhz laptop, and harder to read, so there is a price for everything. I can=B4t find an updated version number, but the new version is exactly 1 699 480 bytes. Valery says that the improvements are: >1. It works faster under Windows XP during EEG recording. >2. It is possible to use graphics acceleration (See "Equipment parameters" >menu Setup). To use graphics acceleration you need to install DirectX 7 or >later. >3. It is possible to change parameters of COM port that is used for >synchronization of PSYTASK. (See "Equipment parameters" menu Setup).This >possibility can help in some cases when COM ports of computers work bad. There is no download site, but I will be happy to forward this WinEEG version to anyone interested. -- Joe Siri Ekgren MD Observatorie Terrasse 6 B, N-0270 Oslo, Norway + 47 9229 4171 (mobile) + 47 22 44 09 18 (home)