We moved some of our clients from 95/98 to 2k and they have found performance actually increase (along with reliability). 95/98 may be faster on slow machines though. -----Original Message----- From: drtester@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:drtester@xxxxxxxxxxx]=20 Sent: 13 August 2002 17:13 To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [windows2000] Re: Windows XP Home Edition in a networking environment Still running 95 here. Have to - too much stuff doesn't work right under 2k. It's also a LOT faster! Mark Mucher wrote: >=20 > Anybody running 98 at work? :-) >=20 > Mark >=20 > Joe Shonk wrote: >=20 > >It's call XP "Home" for a reason. > > > >Joe > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Rod Falanga [mailto:rfalanga@xxxxxxx] > >Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 7:53 AM > >To: Windows 2000 List (E-mail) > >Subject: [windows2000] Windows XP Home Edition in a networking=20 > >environment > > > > > >We've got a small departmental environment. Windows 2000 Server and=20 > >Active Directory. Currently all of our desktop users have Windows=20 > >2000 Professional on their machines. Over time we will probably=20 > >upgrade to Windows XP. I am thinking about putting XP Home Edition=20 > >onto the user's PCs and XP Pro onto the developers and system admins=20 > >PCs. I'm wondering if that's a reasonable scenario, or would it be=20 > >better to put XP Pro on all PCs? > > > >Rod > > > > >=20 > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation > mode or view archives use the below link. >=20 > http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm ================================== To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm