No one said every file name... I block a range of extensions, but my users need to share Word and Excel documents, so I have to mitigate those risks via other means. But agree to disagree sounds like a good idea. ;-) I would be interested in the user settings you mention. I have about as "locked down" environment as I can, but it is always good to compare notes... Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA David Clark Company Inc. -----Original Message----- From: SewardAdmin [mailto:mwm@xxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 12:54 PM To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [windows2000] Re: VIRUS WARNING Jim Quote: By not doing blocking, Mike you are a disaster waiting to happen. We'll agree to disagree! (smiles... in a nice tone of voice!) By blocking every filename - that appears to (a problem) - only adds to your problem as filenames and extensions grow! However, by tuning the workstations "user-settings" - as Systems Managers do - (I hope) - (using Win2K) - it is almost impossible for our users to infect themselves. And that includes, boot records, shared files etc. That is why - we have never have had a virus related problem for the last 9 years! IOHO -(In our humble opinion) - Controlling the user and his workstation - (who logs on the server) - is the key to a fast and secured network! Regards Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Kenzig" <jimkenz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 7:09 AM Subject: [windows2000] Re: VIRUS WARNING > > And the whole point of my warning was that your AV program is only as good > as the update. I don't care what program you have...if we were NOT blocking > Pifs via Trend emanager and hadn't done our daily update yet we surely would > of been infected. > By not doing blocking, Mike you are a disaster waiting to happen. > > The joe average user who doesn't do av updates daily is going to be infected > because sure enough if it says it is coming from MS they are going to click > on it. I would'nt of gotten it 4 times already today if that were not the > case. > > Just by not updating in a day I could of been infected but knew enough not > to click on it because MS never sends attachments unsolicited. I sent the > alert from Vexira because none of the other AV vendors had one up yet. Not > every vendor is going to be on top of every virus so relying heavily on one > or another is going to get you in trouble. That is why I get alerts from > all of them. > > JK > > -----Original Message----- > From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of SewardAdmin > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 10:58 AM > To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [windows2000] Re: VIRUS WARNING > > > > Hi, > > We haven't either - as far as pif files goes - because according to my > records, all pif's recieved thus far - have been virus related - and > therefore have been automatically deleted by Nav... However, as I stated > earlier - we (our organization) - has enough to worry about, than which > filename is good or bad, whereby any filename of any extension - could > contain a virus! > > There's more to protection than AV software and deleting unwanted files. > But that's for another time of discussion! > > Regards > Mike > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Costanzo, Ray" <rcostanzo@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 6:41 AM > Subject: [windows2000] Re: VIRUS WARNING > > > ================================== > To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation > mode or view archives use the below link. > > http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm ================================== To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm ================================== To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm