So correct me if I'm wrong, you're working on a clients computer system, correct? So this company employees are downloading porn, right? The part I am missing is, the call you got from the owner/boss/whathave you that he/she wishes to block the employee's from accessing porn. Or is this to be assumed? The reason I ask is, people are assuming that you have this power to fire people when it reads to me that you're just the computer repair guy. <shrug> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 11:16:28 -0700 Who would have thought, "Durbin, Jeff" <jdurbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> would say this?: DJ> I just upgraded a customer's domain to AD, which, obviously, requires DJ> internal DNS for name resolution. So, all the computers on the network DJ> point to an internal server for DNS, which, in turn, will forward DJ> unresolved requests to the ISP's DNS servers. DJ> The problem I have stems from the fact that the administrator of the DJ> domain has been restricting Internet access by not allowing DNS DJ> resolution (i.e., no DNS servers specified on the workstations). Now DJ> that DNS is a requirement, the users all get Internet access, and DJ> they've gone crazy downloading porn. I realize that they are commercial DJ> products to control Internet access, but does anyone have any cheap/easy DJ> idea for solving the problem? DJ> DJ> Thanks, DJ> DJ> JD ******************************************************** This Week's Sponsor - RTO Software / TScale What's keeping you from getting more from your terminal servers? Did you know, in most cases, CPU Utilization IS NOT the single biggest constraint to scaling up?! Get this free white paper to understand the real constraints & how to overcome them. SAVE MONEY by scaling-up rather than buying more servers. http://www.rtosoft.com/Enter.asp?ID=148 ********************************************************** To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm