[windows2000] Re: Gigabit over copper
- From: Chris Berry <chris_berry-list-windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 09:14:11 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Greg Reese wrote:
| My understanding is that the cabling in my building needs to be Cat5E
| instead of just plain Cat5 for gigabit Ethernet.
I would actually recommend Cat6 if at all possible.
| What happens is the cabling is the plain cat5 and I plug a gigabit nic
| to the gigabit switch? Does it just run at 100bT or does it not run at
| all? Somewhere in between?
It will run like 100bT would on Cat3. Basically you may get some
increased performance, but it will be way below the potential.
- --
Chris Berry
chris_berry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Systems Administrator
JM Associates & Coast Business Service
"Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of
chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course
others take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death." --Patrick
Henry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAt2VTkAS13ByzgbsRAuYLAJ9pHqyueGk0g4Tk2RYHeXYrFs+T7gCgzqiu
qLswwmrPTC89dOzPdkNY6ls=
=gOH1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
********************************************************
This Weeks Sponsor StressedPuppy.com Games
Feeling stressed out? Check out our games to
relieve your stress.
http://www.StressedPuppy.com
********************************************************
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
