Why couldn't they setup the first DNS server on the workstation to be the local and the next in line be the ISP DNS server? > -----Original Message----- > From: Lane, Mark [SMTP:MDL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:21 AM > To: 'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' > Subject: [windows2000] Re: DHCP/DNS & GPO question > > You should configure DNS for your workstations using a local server. Then > configure the local DNS server to use forwarders. Any requests for > resolution that cannot be done locally can be forwarded to your ISP DNS. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:jherchenbach@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:32 AM > To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [windows2000] DHCP/DNS & GPO question > > > Ok, I'm stumped.... > Win2k Server with SP4, same on clients. > I have my DHCP handing out my ISP DNS addresses in this order ISP1 ISP2 > LocalServer > Statics on the Server are in the same order. > With this config, the clients can access all shares, and the internet > works, > but no GPO's are loaded. > > I change the configuration order to LocalServer ISP1 ISP2 > Statics stay the same > With this config, the clients load the GPO's fine, shares work fine, but I > can not access the internet. > > any help would be greatly appreciated, as school is starting soon. > > jim at school > << File: ATT00010.html >> This weeks sponsor - RTOSoft TScale Complaints about applications response time - DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! TScale 2.0 improves applications response time and increases terminal server capacity. Really get MORE from your existing servers! Free eval: http://www.rtosoft.com/enter.asp?id=131 ================================== To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm