>>drivers based on PciCyclic are limited to a minimum latency of 10ms. This >>extra buffering is caused by PortCls. PciWave does not impose any I've been using smaller buffers with WaveCyclic with no unusual problems. Granted, they don't work reliably at very low latencies, but I thought that was my old, slow system. Can this have dire consequences I'm not aware of? tomS -- Computers should make life better. (Or should they?) Tom Surace <tekhedd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <public key:www.keyserver.net> BYTE HEAVEN <http://www.byteheaven.com/> ****************** WDMAUDIODEV addresses: Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe Unsubscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx URL to WDMAUDIODEV page: http://www.wdmaudiodev.de/
