[visionegg] pygame v. visionegg
- From: John Christie <jc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: visionegg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 17:07:42 -0400
OK,
So, for those of you who are serious psychopysicists the subject of
this makes no sense. I mean, Vision Egg is massively more flexible
for psychophysics.
However, for just doing basic cognitive tasks its often a little
simpler (and better documented) to whip something up in pygame.
As a very recent vision egg newbie my question is twofold. What are
the advantages of Vision Egg when you just need to draw simple shapes
and then gather responses. And, is it hard to work with the two
together, that does one need to watch out for? For example, what is
the relationship between visionegg viewports and pygame surfaces?
How can I use a pygame draw and put it in a visionegg viewport?
======================================
The Vision Egg mailing list
Archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/visionegg
Website: http://www.visionegg.org/mailinglist.html
Other related posts:
