Hi John
What do you think about this approach
We are pre testing a need to help organisations deal with some of their
efficacy issues - ask for anonymous participation
Two parts (for now we may add more) 1 dealing with system/ 2 dealing with
clients /service beneficiaries - I'm asking you these questions as head of
men's sheds
Setting - in terms of dealing with finders or funding processes
Q What in your view are the 3 most important measurement metrics finders
look for
1
2
3
Q in your view what do you think are the most important metrics they should
be using and why?
1
2
3
Why? - answer box
Setting - When dealing with clients/service beneficiaries
Q What in your view is the 3 most important measurement metrics to see how
the client is improving as a result of your service or delivery process
(that's two different focus points and may need to be different sections of
this study)
1
2
3
Please add anything you think that can show more benefit related to your
service that may not be measured properly at present - please consider
efficacy of process in benefit to client - form of delivery - an area of
benefit finders should look at but don't yet value -
Please use a separate answer sheet if necessary
Answer box
Use your men's shed hat John not your valid impact hat
On 31 Mar 2017 00:26, "Richie K" <sayrichiek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK I thought so - they sounded like you talking - especially the magic bit
- when you do speak to someone think about 'what is it that they would want
to measure that isn't being measured' - even if the funders aren't
interested in that data we need to find new or fresh perspectives - and we
need to question why what's asked is asked and what is better to know - I
know you have said this before or the real change for the client - but we
need to know the details of the specific scenario / environment/service
delivery to if the question we use can impact on the funders perspective -
maybe when I think about it in terms of men's sheds you can reply as that
person and we'll see if we can get closer to a game plan
On 31 Mar 2017 00:15, "John Evoy" <johnevoy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No just out of my head.
Trying to get the best chance of finding the info we need.
On 31 March 2017 at 00:11, Richie K <sayrichiek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Will give it a go John but I lack experience of what the admin person
says to another person on staff over a coffee break what it is they want to
prove that the finders don't see or can't measure - those types of snippets
give us the question area and specific type of response - next will be the
questions that draw that from the client
Did those 4 questions come from you based on your experience or from a
chat with someone?
On 31 Mar 2017 00:06, "John Evoy" <johnevoy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks richie,
You seem to have a good grasp of it. Would you mind redraft the
questions, whenever you get the chance. I'm not really on the mark with it.
Good night men.
On 30 March 2017 at 22:56, Richie K <sayrichiek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Something like what part of your work shows the specific improvement of
your clients and is the benefit validated to the people that fund you
That's just off the top of my head so probably not a great example
I think the idea is to hit the efficacy of their work then find how to
express it to their superiors/ funders
On 30 Mar 2017 22:52, "Richie K" <sayrichiek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
3&4 are irrelevant John as they are general and don't seek specifics -
I will have a look in the morning and send some suggestions -
On 30 Mar 2017 22:48, "John Evoy" <johnevoy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Guys,
See attached a very simple draft questionnaire. Please change whatever
you think to improve it.
Great to meet you all last night.
