And may never know how COVID got to us. Eric
May 27, 2021
[Author
Headshot]<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/cPM2BtEBpyQ1MRVE2OHMAQ~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP0S_aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubnl0aW1lcy5jb20vYnkvZGF2aWQtbGVvbmhhcmR0P2NhbXBhaWduX2lkPTkmZW1jPWVkaXRfbm5fMjAyMTA1MjcmaW5zdGFuY2VfaWQ9MzE2OTAmbmw9dGhlLW1vcm5pbmcmcmVnaV9pZD0xMTkxMzQ1OTMmc2VnbWVudF9pZD01OTE2MyZ0ZT0xJnVzZXJfaWQ9NTE5ZGQ2ZTQ3N2I2MWRiMDFiNmMwNzZkN2M1N2U3NTZXA255dEIKYK5bc69gk7NLZFIWZXJpY3BydXNzZWxsQGdtYWlsLmNvbVgEAAAAAA~~>
By David
Leonhardt<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/cPM2BtEBpyQ1MRVE2OHMAQ~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP0S_aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubnl0aW1lcy5jb20vYnkvZGF2aWQtbGVvbmhhcmR0P2NhbXBhaWduX2lkPTkmZW1jPWVkaXRfbm5fMjAyMTA1MjcmaW5zdGFuY2VfaWQ9MzE2OTAmbmw9dGhlLW1vcm5pbmcmcmVnaV9pZD0xMTkxMzQ1OTMmc2VnbWVudF9pZD01OTE2MyZ0ZT0xJnVzZXJfaWQ9NTE5ZGQ2ZTQ3N2I2MWRiMDFiNmMwNzZkN2M1N2U3NTZXA255dEIKYK5bc69gk7NLZFIWZXJpY3BydXNzZWxsQGdtYWlsLmNvbVgEAAAAAA~~>
Good morning. The lab-leak theory is everywhere. We have an explainer.
[https://ci4.googleusercontent.com/proxy/IraLkgG5IpKpzq9pZ0XQFfBebaQK03DAV3pOy5QwobLbsuwXd3Ma1CtS4LK5y9YEPUib0wLTRotaRLuAvrxV8erS27tWOBe31QLiDq6yvvtssk6ewRTnSHgu__rpu0hZsZkqiE8-US1NXjNtXmqVBsLQ2GwXcffJ=s0-d-e1-ft#https://static01.nyt.com/images/2021/05/27/lens/27ambriefing-lab/27ambriefing-lab-articleLarge-v2.jpg]
Members of the World Health Organization at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in
February.Hector Retamal/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Groupthink + polarization
Suddenly, talk of the Wuhan lab-leak theory seems to be everywhere.
President Biden yesterday called on U.S. intelligence officials to “redouble
their
efforts”<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/newsletter/n4-V1uycC6wDRYdATwEU4g~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP0TiaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubnl0aW1lcy5jb20vMjAyMS8wNS8yNi91cy9wb2xpdGljcy9iaWRlbi1jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1vcmlnaW5zLmh0bWw_Y2FtcGFpZ25faWQ9OSZlbWM9ZWRpdF9ubl8yMDIxMDUyNyZpbnN0YW5jZV9pZD0zMTY5MCZubD10aGUtbW9ybmluZyZyZWdpX2lkPTExOTEzNDU5MyZzZWdtZW50X2lkPTU5MTYzJnRlPTEmdXNlcl9pZD01MTlkZDZlNDc3YjYxZGIwMWI2YzA3NmQ3YzU3ZTc1NlcDbnl0Qgpgrltzr2CTs0tkUhZlcmljcHJ1c3NlbGxAZ21haWwuY29tWAQAAAAA>
to determine the origin of Covid-19 and figure out whether the virus that
causes it accidentally leaked from a Chinese laboratory. Major publications and
social media have recently been filled with discussion of the subject.
Today, we offer an explainer.
What are the basics?
The origin of the virus remains unclear. Many scientists have long believed
that the most likely explanation is that it jumped from an animal to a person,
possibly at a food market in Wuhan, China, in late 2019. Animal-to human
transmission — known as zoonotic spillover — is a common origin story for
viruses, including Ebola and some bird flus.
But some scientists have pointed to another possibility: that it escaped from
the Wuhan Institute of Virology. As in other laboratories, researchers there
sometimes modify viruses, to understand and treat them.
“It is most likely that this is a virus that arose naturally, but we cannot
exclude the possibility of some kind of a lab accident,” Dr. Francis Collins,
the director of the National Institutes of Health, told senators yesterday.
Why now?
The subject is getting more attention because some scientists who were once
skeptical of the laboratory theory have expressed new openness to it.
Two weeks ago, 18 scientists wrote a letter to the journal Science calling for
a new investigation and describing both the animal-to-human theory and the
lab-leak theory as
“viable.”<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/EDOenm2TeX750aE1HxqZTA~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP0TKaHR0cHM6Ly9zY2llbmNlLnNjaWVuY2VtYWcub3JnL2NvbnRlbnQvMzcyLzY1NDMvNjk0LjE_Y2FtcGFpZ25faWQ9OSZlbWM9ZWRpdF9ubl8yMDIxMDUyNyZpbnN0YW5jZV9pZD0zMTY5MCZubD10aGUtbW9ybmluZyZyZWdpX2lkPTExOTEzNDU5MyZzZWdtZW50X2lkPTU5MTYzJnRlPTEmdXNlcl9pZD01MTlkZDZlNDc3YjYxZGIwMWI2YzA3NmQ3YzU3ZTc1NlcDbnl0Qgpgrltzr2CTs0tkUhZlcmljcHJ1c3NlbGxAZ21haWwuY29tWAQAAAAA>
And three scientists who last year dismissed the lab-leak explanation as a
conspiracy theory have told The Wall Street Journal that they now consider it
plausible<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/bwgqBmaPdg_9c5so5mvntQ~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP0TxaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cud3NqLmNvbS9hcnRpY2xlcy93dWhhbi1sYWItbGVhay1xdWVzdGlvbi1jaGluZXNlLW1pbmUtY292aWQtcGFuZGVtaWMtMTE2MjE4NzExMjU_Y2FtcGFpZ25faWQ9OSZlbWM9ZWRpdF9ubl8yMDIxMDUyNyZpbnN0YW5jZV9pZD0zMTY5MCZubD10aGUtbW9ybmluZyZyZWdpX2lkPTExOTEzNDU5MyZzZWdtZW50X2lkPTU5MTYzJnRlPTEmdXNlcl9pZD01MTlkZDZlNDc3YjYxZGIwMWI2YzA3NmQ3YzU3ZTc1NlcDbnl0Qgpgrltzr2CTs0tkUhZlcmljcHJ1c3NlbGxAZ21haWwuY29tWAQAAAAA>.
Among the reasons: Chinese officials have refused to allow an independent
investigation into the lab and have failed to explain some inconsistencies in
the animal-to-human hypothesis. Most of the first confirmed cases had no
evident link to the food market.
What changed?
In some ways, not much has not changed. From the beginning, the virus’s origin
has been unclear. All along, some scientists, politicians and journalists have
argued that the lab-leak theory deserves consideration.
Almost 15 months ago, two Chinese
researchers<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/BDL6xDNzfWkkj5-3stlntw~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP0T-aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWctcHJvZC50Z2NvbTI0Lm1lZGlhc2V0Lml0L2ltYWdlcy8yMDIwLzAyLzE2LzExNDcyMDE5Mi01ZWI4MzA3Zi0wMTdjLTQwNzUtYTY5Ny0zNDg2MjhkYTAyMDQucGRmP2NhbXBhaWduX2lkPTkmZW1jPWVkaXRfbm5fMjAyMTA1MjcmaW5zdGFuY2VfaWQ9MzE2OTAmbmw9dGhlLW1vcm5pbmcmcmVnaV9pZD0xMTkxMzQ1OTMmc2VnbWVudF9pZD01OTE2MyZ0ZT0xJnVzZXJfaWQ9NTE5ZGQ2ZTQ3N2I2MWRiMDFiNmMwNzZkN2M1N2U3NTZXA255dEIKYK5bc69gk7NLZFIWZXJpY3BydXNzZWxsQGdtYWlsLmNvbVgEAAAAAA~~>
wrote a paper concluding that the virus “probably originated from a laboratory
in Wuhan.” Alina
Chan<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/lg9nUAf-wMsi0LACF7EUvA~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP0TraHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYm9zdG9ubWFnYXppbmUuY29tL25ld3MvMjAyMC8wOS8wOS9hbGluYS1jaGFuLWJyb2FkLWluc3RpdHV0ZS1jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy8_Y2FtcGFpZ25faWQ9OSZlbWM9ZWRpdF9ubl8yMDIxMDUyNyZpbnN0YW5jZV9pZD0zMTY5MCZubD10aGUtbW9ybmluZyZyZWdpX2lkPTExOTEzNDU5MyZzZWdtZW50X2lkPTU5MTYzJnRlPTEmdXNlcl9pZD01MTlkZDZlNDc3YjYxZGIwMWI2YzA3NmQ3YzU3ZTc1NlcDbnl0Qgpgrltzr2CTs0tkUhZlcmljcHJ1c3NlbGxAZ21haWwuY29tWAQAAAAA>,
a molecular biologist affiliated with Harvard and M.I.T., made similar
arguments. David
Ignatius<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/j-WUjnNwBCecCpiqX3tlTg~~/AAAAAQA~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~>
and Josh
Rogin<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/xCFWaawfHgrU0COQevof2g~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP4QaAWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lndhc2hpbmd0b25wb3N0LmNvbS9vcGluaW9ucy8yMDIwLzA0LzE0L3N0YXRlLWRlcGFydG1lbnQtY2FibGVzLXdhcm5lZC1zYWZldHktaXNzdWVzLXd1aGFuLWxhYi1zdHVkeWluZy1iYXQtY29yb25hdmlydXNlcy8_Y2FtcGFpZ25faWQ9OSZlbWM9ZWRpdF9ubl8yMDIxMDUyNyZpbnN0YW5jZV9pZD0zMTY5MCZubD10aGUtbW9ybmluZyZyZWdpX2lkPTExOTEzNDU5MyZzZWdtZW50X2lkPTU5MTYzJnRlPTEmdXNlcl9pZD01MTlkZDZlNDc3YjYxZGIwMWI2YzA3NmQ3YzU3ZTc1NlcDbnl0Qgpgrltzr2CTs0tkUhZlcmljcHJ1c3NlbGxAZ21haWwuY29tWAQAAAAA>,
both Washington Post columnists, wrote about the possibility more than a year
ago. Joe Biden, then a presidential candidate, didn’t mention the lab-leak
theory in early 2020 but he did argue that the U.S. should “not be taking
China’s word” for how the outbreak started.
But these voices were in the minority. The World Health Organization initially
dismissed the lab-leak theory as implausible.
[https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/pVIiTvcDtyzYpQS28dbIE5NndPIFUu07iV4hugek2nYX5HS7QVss3IxCEXpGMQzYlubFjEjr7RMC5odwn1VF0DMfd2jRmviVWH6G2wpNFIAEkemWfeAScptCYrcBz934c03a5WtKnUZoD9PY8h2mInBfyALggq7pURdSwvaG5bs=s0-d-e1-ft#https://static01.nyt.com/images/2021/05/27/lens/27ambriefing-market2/27ambriefing-market2-articleLarge-v2.jpg]
The Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan, which has been linked to the coronavirus
that causes Covid-19.Noel Celis/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Why all the dismissals?
It appears to be a classic example of groupthink, exacerbated by partisan
polarization.
Global health officials seemed unwilling to confront Chinese officials, who
insist the virus jumped from an animal to a person.
In the U.S., one of the theory’s earliest advocates was Tom Cotton, the
Republican senator from Arkansas who often criticizes China — and who has a
history<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/cz-_Jj2xSLlS9VUJJfY75A~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP0TJaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucG9saXRpZmFjdC5jb20vcGVyc29uYWxpdGllcy90b20tY290dG9uLz9jYW1wYWlnbl9pZD05JmVtYz1lZGl0X25uXzIwMjEwNTI3Jmluc3RhbmNlX2lkPTMxNjkwJm5sPXRoZS1tb3JuaW5nJnJlZ2lfaWQ9MTE5MTM0NTkzJnNlZ21lbnRfaWQ9NTkxNjMmdGU9MSZ1c2VyX2lkPTUxOWRkNmU0NzdiNjFkYjAxYjZjMDc2ZDdjNTdlNzU2VwNueXRCCmCuW3OvYJOzS2RSFmVyaWNwcnVzc2VsbEBnbWFpbC5jb21YBAAAAAA~>
of promoting falsehoods (like election fraud that didn’t
happen<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/uBdU_iGoqAEgEpfAPrfPAw~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP0T1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuY290dG9uLnNlbmF0ZS5nb3YvbmV3cy9wcmVzcy1yZWxlYXNlcy9jb3R0b24tc3RhdGVtZW50LW9uLWpvaW50LXNlc3Npb24tb2YtY29uZ3Jlc3MtP2NhbXBhaWduX2lkPTkmZW1jPWVkaXRfbm5fMjAyMTA1MjcmaW5zdGFuY2VfaWQ9MzE2OTAmbmw9dGhlLW1vcm5pbmcmcmVnaV9pZD0xMTkxMzQ1OTMmc2VnbWVudF9pZD01OTE2MyZ0ZT0xJnVzZXJfaWQ9NTE5ZGQ2ZTQ3N2I2MWRiMDFiNmMwNzZkN2M1N2U3NTZXA255dEIKYK5bc69gk7NLZFIWZXJpY3BydXNzZWxsQGdtYWlsLmNvbVgEAAAAAA~~>).
In this case, though, Cotton was making an argument with plausible supporting
evidence.
The media’s coverage of his argument was flawed, Substack’s Matthew Yglesias
has
written<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/iRnrA5auyREZXIyw_AACmg~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP0TMaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuc2xvd2JvcmluZy5jb20vcC90aGUtbWVkaWFzLWxhYi1sZWFrLWZpYXNjbz9jYW1wYWlnbl9pZD05JmVtYz1lZGl0X25uXzIwMjEwNTI3Jmluc3RhbmNlX2lkPTMxNjkwJm5sPXRoZS1tb3JuaW5nJnJlZ2lfaWQ9MTE5MTM0NTkzJnNlZ21lbnRfaWQ9NTkxNjMmdGU9MSZ1c2VyX2lkPTUxOWRkNmU0NzdiNjFkYjAxYjZjMDc2ZDdjNTdlNzU2VwNueXRCCmCuW3OvYJOzS2RSFmVyaWNwcnVzc2VsbEBnbWFpbC5jb21YBAAAAAA~>.
Some coverage exaggerated Cotton’s comments to suggest he was claiming that
China had deliberately released the virus as a biological weapon. (Cotton
called that “very unlikely.”) And some scientists and others also seem to have
decided that if Cotton believed something — and Fox News and Donald Trump
echoed it — the idea had to be wrong.
The result, as Yglesias called it, was a bubble of fake consensus. Scientists
who thought a lab leak was plausible, like Chan, received little attention.
Scientists who thought the theory was wacky received widespread attention. It’s
a good reminder: The world is a complicated place, where almost nobody is
always right or always wrong.
Why does it matter?
The virus’s origin does not affect many parts of the fight against Covid. The
best mitigation strategies — travel restrictions, testing, contact tracing,
social distancing, ventilation and masking — are still the best mitigation
strategies.
But there are at least three concrete ways, in addition to the inherent value
of truth, in which the origin matters.
First, if the virus really did come from a lab, an immediate airing of the
details might have led to even faster vaccine development and more effective
treatments. Second, a leak that caused millions of deaths could lead to
widespread change in laboratories’ safety precautions. Third, confirmation of a
leak would affect the world’s view of China — and would put pressure on China
to bear the burden of vaccinating the world as quickly as possible.
So what’s the truth?
We don’t know. Both animal-to-human transmission and the lab leak appear
plausible. And the obfuscation by Chinese officials means we may never know the
truth.
For more: The Washington Post has published a helpful
timeline<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/GtDF8vvWU91CTQYN9rj0-A~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP4QEAWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lndhc2hpbmd0b25wb3N0LmNvbS9wb2xpdGljcy8yMDIxLzA1LzI1L3RpbWVsaW5lLWhvdy13dWhhbi1sYWItbGVhay10aGVvcnktc3VkZGVubHktYmVjYW1lLWNyZWRpYmxlLz9jYW1wYWlnbl9pZD05JmVtYz1lZGl0X25uXzIwMjEwNTI3Jmluc3RhbmNlX2lkPTMxNjkwJm5sPXRoZS1tb3JuaW5nJnJlZ2lfaWQ9MTE5MTM0NTkzJnNlZ21lbnRfaWQ9NTkxNjMmdGU9MSZ1c2VyX2lkPTUxOWRkNmU0NzdiNjFkYjAxYjZjMDc2ZDdjNTdlNzU2VwNueXRCCmCuW3OvYJOzS2RSFmVyaWNwcnVzc2VsbEBnbWFpbC5jb21YBAAAAAA~>.
On Medium last week, the science writer Donald G. McNeil
Jr.<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/w8y1ixAgNvo3zFB8fYepJg~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP4QEAWh0dHBzOi8vZG9uYWxkZ21jbmVpbGpyMTk1NC5tZWRpdW0uY29tL2hvdy1pLWxlYXJuZWQtdG8tc3RvcC13b3JyeWluZy1hbmQtbG92ZS10aGUtbGFiLWxlYWstdGhlb3J5LWY0Zjg4NDQ2YjA0ZD9jYW1wYWlnbl9pZD05JmVtYz1lZGl0X25uXzIwMjEwNTI3Jmluc3RhbmNlX2lkPTMxNjkwJm5sPXRoZS1tb3JuaW5nJnJlZ2lfaWQ9MTE5MTM0NTkzJnNlZ21lbnRfaWQ9NTkxNjMmdGU9MSZ1c2VyX2lkPTUxOWRkNmU0NzdiNjFkYjAxYjZjMDc2ZDdjNTdlNzU2VwNueXRCCmCuW3OvYJOzS2RSFmVyaWNwcnVzc2VsbEBnbWFpbC5jb21YBAAAAAA~>
explained why he now finds the lab-leak theory plausible. And the sociologist
Zeynep
Tufekci<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/a/Wljd2OEGgr_ylK6a4zjmAA~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP0TRaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cudGhlaW5zaWdodC5vcmcvcC9jaGVja2luZy1mYWN0cy1ldmVuLWlmLW9uZS1jYW50P2NhbXBhaWduX2lkPTkmZW1jPWVkaXRfbm5fMjAyMTA1MjcmaW5zdGFuY2VfaWQ9MzE2OTAmbmw9dGhlLW1vcm5pbmcmcmVnaV9pZD0xMTkxMzQ1OTMmc2VnbWVudF9pZD01OTE2MyZ0ZT0xJnVzZXJfaWQ9NTE5ZGQ2ZTQ3N2I2MWRiMDFiNmMwNzZkN2M1N2U3NTZXA255dEIKYK5bc69gk7NLZFIWZXJpY3BydXNzZWxsQGdtYWlsLmNvbVgEAAAAAA~~>
has argued that the issue highlights some of the problem with the media’s
approach to fact-checking.
The Times reports on the latest details about the inquiry Biden has
ordered<https://nl.nytimes.com/f/newsletter/n4-V1uycC6wDRYdATwEU4g~~/AAAAAQA~/RgRikfhbP0TiaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubnl0aW1lcy5jb20vMjAyMS8wNS8yNi91cy9wb2xpdGljcy9iaWRlbi1jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1vcmlnaW5zLmh0bWw_Y2FtcGFpZ25faWQ9OSZlbWM9ZWRpdF9ubl8yMDIxMDUyNyZpbnN0YW5jZV9pZD0zMTY5MCZubD10aGUtbW9ybmluZyZyZWdpX2lkPTExOTEzNDU5MyZzZWdtZW50X2lkPTU5MTYzJnRlPTEmdXNlcl9pZD01MTlkZDZlNDc3YjYxZGIwMWI2YzA3NmQ3YzU3ZTc1NlcDbnl0Qgpgrltzr2CTs0tkUhZlcmljcHJ1c3NlbGxAZ21haWwuY29tWAQAAAAA>.
