[uupretirees] Re: : Merrick Garland's non-answers on Big Tech are grounds to think twice about confirming him

  • From: Eric Russell <ericprussell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 16:26:12 +0000

Funny, I don't recall seeing similar criticism of any of Trump's appointees 
appearing in the Pest.  Disingenuous or hypocrisy?  Eric

________________________________
From: uupretirees-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on 
behalf of hils. <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 6, 2021 9:32 AM
To: uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [uupretirees] : Merrick Garland's non-answers on Big Tech are grounds 
to think twice about confirming him





I thought you'd be interested in this story from the New York Post.

Merrick Garland's non-answers on Big Tech are grounds to think twice about 
confirming him
https://nypost.com/2021/03/05/merrick-garlands-big-tech-non-answers-grounds-to-think-twice-on-him/?utm_source=email_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site%20buttons&utm_campaign=site%20buttons<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnypost.com%2F2021%2F03%2F05%2Fmerrick-garlands-big-tech-non-answers-grounds-to-think-twice-on-him%2F%3Futm_source%3Demail_sitebuttons%26utm_medium%3Dsite%2520buttons%26utm_campaign%3Dsite%2520buttons&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cfd52f216dd0640fc2c3a08d8e0acba34%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637506379748811922%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=SMN4HRJwR6xoIh2nhMxwnVvC35x3fTS1SnjqvhxQNBk%3D&reserved=0>

Bob Kasprak
========================

Other related posts: