[uupretirees] It's a question of whether or not a case is limited by time remaining in office

  • From: Eric Russell <ericprussell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Uupretirees Yahoogroups <uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:37:03 +0000

And whether there should be consequences for seditious acts.  Eric

Breaking With G.O.P., Top Conservative Lawyer Says Trump Can Stand Trial

Charles J. Cooper, a stalwart of the conservative legal establishment, said 
that Republicans were wrong to assert that it is unconstitutional for a former 
president to be tried for impeachable offenses.

  *   
<https://www.facebook.com/dialog/feed?app_id=9869919170&link=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2021%2F02%2F07%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fcharles-cooper-trump-impeachment.html%3Fsmid%3Dfb-share&name=Breaking%20With%20G.O.P.%2C%20Top%20Conservative%20Lawyer%20Says%20Trump%20Can%20Stand%20Trial&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2F>
  *   
<https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Breaking%20With%20G.O.P.%2C%20Top%20Conservative%20Lawyer%20Says%20Trump%20Can%20Stand%20Trial%20https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2021%2F02%2F07%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fcharles-cooper-trump-impeachment.html%3Fsmid%3Dwa-share>
  *   
<https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2021%2F02%2F07%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fcharles-cooper-trump-impeachment.html%3Fsmid%3Dtw-share&text=Breaking%20With%20G.O.P.%2C%20Top%20Conservative%20Lawyer%20Says%20Trump%20Can%20Stand%20Trial>
  *   
<mailto:?subject=NYTimes.com%3A%20Breaking%20With%20G.O.P.%2C%20Top%20Conservative%20Lawyer%20Says%20Trump%20Can%20Stand%20Trial&body=From%20The%20New%20York%20Times%3A%0A%0ABreaking%20With%20G.O.P.%2C%20Top%20Conservative%20Lawyer%20Says%20Trump%20Can%20Stand%20Trial%0A%0ACharles%20J.%20Cooper%2C%20a%20stalwart%20of%20the%20conservative%20legal%20establishment%2C%20said%20that%20Republicans%20were%20wrong%20to%20assert%20that%20it%20is%20unconstitutional%20for%20a%20former%20president%20to%20be%20tried%20for%20impeachable%20offenses.%0A%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2021%2F02%2F07%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fcharles-cooper-trump-impeachment.html%3Fsmid%3Dem-share>
  *
  *

[https://static01.nyt.com/images/2021/02/07/us/politics/07dc-impeach-legal/merlin_40775623_86d6b5ce-38e0-4045-a62b-f5b40efd02ef-articleLarge.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale]
[Charles J. Cooper made his argument two days before the Senate was set to 
start former President Donald J. Trump’s impeachment trial.]
Charles J. Cooper made his argument two days before the Senate was set to start 
former President Donald J. Trump’s impeachment trial.Credit...Jim Wilson/The 
New York Times
[Michael S. Schmidt]<https://www.nytimes.com/by/michael-s-schmidt>

By Michael S. Schmidt<https://www.nytimes.com/by/michael-s-schmidt>

  *   Feb. 7, 2021

One of Washington’s leading conservative constitutional lawyers publicly broke 
on Sunday with the main Republican argument against convicting former President 
Donald J. Trump in his impeachment 
trial<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/07/us/politics/trump-impeachment.html>, 
asserting that an ex-president can indeed be tried for high crimes and 
misdemeanors.

In an opinion piece posted on The Wall Street Journal’s 
website<https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-constitution-doesnt-bar-trumps-impeachment-trial-11612724124?mod=opinion_lead_pos5>,
 the lawyer, Charles J. Cooper, who is closely allied with top Republicans in 
Congress, dismissed as illogical the claim that it is unconstitutional to hold 
an impeachment trial for a former president. The piece came two days before the 
Senate was set to start the proceeding, in which Mr. Trump is charged with 
“incitement of insurrection” in connection with the deadly assault on the 
Capitol by his supporters on Jan. 6.

Since the rampage, Republicans have made little effort to excuse Mr. Trump’s 
conduct, but have coalesced behind the legal argument about constitutionality 
as their rationale for why he should not be tried, much less convicted. Their 
theory is that because the Constitution’s penalty for an impeachment conviction 
is removal from office, it was never intended to apply to a former president, 
who is no longer in office.

Many legal scholars disagree, and the Senate has previously held an impeachment 
trial of a former official — though never a former president. But 45 Republican 
senators, including Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority leader who is 
said to believe that Mr. Trump committed impeachable offenses, voted last month 
to dismiss the trial as unconstitutional on those 
grounds<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/26/us/politics/republicans-impeachment-trump.html>.

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main 
story<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/07/us/politics/charles-cooper-trump-impeachment.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20210207&instance_id=26877&nl=the-morning&regi_id=119134593&segment_id=51209&te=1&user_id=519dd6e477b61db01b6c076d7c57e756#after-story-ad-1>

Mr. Cooper said they were misreading the Constitution.

“The provision cuts against their interpretation,” he wrote. He argued that 
because the Constitution allows the Senate to bar officials convicted of 
impeachable offenses from holding public office again in the future, “it defies 
logic to suggest that the Senate is prohibited from trying and convicting 
former officeholders.”

Mr. Cooper’s decision to take on the argument was particularly significant 
because of his standing in conservative legal circles. He was a close confidant 
and adviser to Senate Republicans, like Ted Cruz of Texas when he ran for 
president, and represented House Republicans — including the minority leader, 
Representative Kevin McCarthy of California — in a lawsuit against Speaker 
Nancy 
Pelosi<https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/26/us/politics/house-lawsuit-proxy-voting-coronavirus.html>.
 He is also the lawyer for conservative stalwarts like John R. Bolton and Jeff 
Sessions, and over his career defended California’s same-sex marriage ban and 
had been a top outside lawyer for the National Rifle Association.

But Mr. Cooper, who is said to be dismayed by the unwillingness of House and 
Senate Republicans to hold Mr. Trump accountable, took on the main claim made 
by his own confidants and clients, offering a series of scholarly and technical 
arguments for why the Constitution allows for a former president to stand trial.

It was unclear whether Mr. Cooper’s opinion would have any influence on the 
outcome of the trial. It could provide cover to Republican senators open to 
convicting Mr. Trump who were caught off guard by last month’s vote, forced by 
Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, to effectively dismiss the case as 
unconstitutional. Some Republicans have since said they did not necessarily 
mean to signal that they were opposed to hearing the case, or had made up their 
minds about Mr. Trump’s guilt.

Seventeen Republicans would have to join with all 50 Democrats to reach the 
two-thirds threshold necessary to convict Mr. Trump — something that appears to 
be exceedingly unlikely.

Editors’ Picks
<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/07/arts/television/saturday-night-live-dan-levy-phoebe-bridgers.html?action=click&algo=use&block=editors_picks_recirc&fellback=false&imp_id=110279546&impression_id=9283e460-6a2a-11eb-8d42-21c2c02a559a&index=0&pgtype=Article&region=ccolumn&req_id=563927091&surface=home-featured&variant=2_use&action=click&module=editorContent&pgtype=Article&region=CompanionColumn&contentCollection=Trending>
[https://static01.nyt.com/images/2021/02/08/arts/07snl/07snl-square640-v3.png?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale&width=350]
‘Saturday Night Live’ Throws a Super Bowl Party With Host Dan Levy
<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/07/business/dolly-parton-5-to-9-super-bowl.html?action=click&algo=use&block=editors_picks_recirc&fellback=false&imp_id=494075481&impression_id=9283e461-6a2a-11eb-8d42-21c2c02a559a&index=1&pgtype=Article&region=ccolumn&req_id=563927091&surface=home-featured&variant=2_use&action=click&module=editorContent&pgtype=Article&region=CompanionColumn&contentCollection=Trending>
[https://static01.nyt.com/images/2021/02/06/business/06Dolly-Workday-lede/06Dolly-Workday-lede-square640.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale&width=350]
The Working Woman’s Anthem ‘9 to 5’ Needed an Update. But This?
<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/04/arts/television/tv-coronavirus-pandemic.html?action=click&algo=use&block=editors_picks_recirc&fellback=false&imp_id=83905967&impression_id=9283e462-6a2a-11eb-8d42-21c2c02a559a&index=2&pgtype=Article&region=ccolumn&req_id=563927091&surface=home-featured&variant=2_use&action=click&module=editorContent&pgtype=Article&region=CompanionColumn&contentCollection=Trending>
[https://static01.nyt.com/images/2021/02/07/arts/07covid-tv-greys/07covid-tv-greys-square640-v2.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale&width=350]
How the Pandemic Is Coming to Prime Time (or Not)
Continue reading the main 
story<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/07/us/politics/charles-cooper-trump-impeachment.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20210207&instance_id=26877&nl=the-morning&regi_id=119134593&segment_id=51209&te=1&user_id=519dd6e477b61db01b6c076d7c57e756&action=click&module=editorContent&pgtype=Article&region=CompanionColumn&contentCollection=Trending#after-pp_edpick>

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main 
story<https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/07/us/politics/charles-cooper-trump-impeachment.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20210207&instance_id=26877&nl=the-morning&regi_id=119134593&segment_id=51209&te=1&user_id=519dd6e477b61db01b6c076d7c57e756#after-story-ad-2>

But Mr. Cooper seemed to be working to change minds. He wrote in his opinion 
piece that in the short time since the vote, legal experts’ understanding of 
the issue had evolved and “exposed the serious weakness of Mr. Paul’s analysis.”

“The senators who supported Mr. Paul’s motion,” he wrote, “should reconsider 
their view and judge the former president’s misconduct on the merits.”

The question of constitutionality could come to a head quickly when the trial 
opens on Tuesday. Though Senate leaders were still debating the precise 
structure of the trial, prosecutors and Mr. Trump’s defense team were preparing 
for the possibility that Mr. Paul or another senator could force a second vote 
on the question on the opening day, before either side gets into their full 
presentations.

Mr. Cooper has a deep and long history in the conservative legal movement. He 
grew up in Alabama, and despite not attending an Ivy League law school, landed 
a clerkship for Justice William H. Rehnquist in 1978 before he became the chief 
justice, and at a time when Justice Rehnquist was considered the most 
conservative member of the court.

Mr. Cooper went on to become the head of the Justice Department’s Office of 
Legal Counsel during the Reagan administration, writing several highly 
conservative and controversial interpretations of the law, including one about 
whether employers could decline to hire someone who may have AIDS.

As a private lawyer, he has defended issues like school prayer and was an 
active member in the Federalist Society. In 2010, when the Republican National 
Lawyers Association named him the Republican lawyer of the year, there were 
three speakers for Mr. Cooper: Mr. Bolton; the head of the N.R.A., Wayne 
LaPierre; and Ed Meese, an attorney general under Ronald Reagan who was 
considered among the most conservative in the department’s history.

In the early days of the Trump administration, Mr. Cooper — who is longtime 
friends with Mr. Sessions — was considered to be the solicitor general. But Mr. 
Cooper remained in private practice, becoming the lawyer for Mr. Sessions as he 
was enmeshed in controversy related to the Russia investigation. In the second 
half of the Trump presidency, Mr. Cooper represented Mr. Bolton and his deputy, 
Charles Kupperman, in the first impeachment trial of Mr. Trump.

Mr. Cooper has continued to represent Mr. Bolton as the Justice Department has 
sued him to recoup money he made from a damning book he published about Mr. 
Trump.

Nicholas Fandos contributed reporting.

Michael S. Schmidt is a Washington correspondent covering national security and 
federal investigations. He was part of two teams that won Pulitzer Prizes in 
2018 — one for reporting on workplace sexual harassment and the other for 
coverage of President Trump and his campaign’s ties to Russia. 
@NYTMike<https://twitter.com/NYTMike>

A version of this article appears in print on Feb. 8, 2021, Section A, Page 13 
of the New York edition with the headline: A G.O.P. Legal Ace Rebuts Trump’s 
Case. Order Reprints<http://www.nytreprints.com/> | Today’s 
Paper<https://www.nytimes.com/section/todayspaper> | 
Subscribe<https://www.nytimes.com/subscriptions/Multiproduct/lp8HYKU.html?campaignId=48JQY>

  *   
<https://www.facebook.com/dialog/feed?app_id=9869919170&link=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2021%2F02%2F07%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fcharles-cooper-trump-impeachment.html%3Fsmid%3Dfb-share&name=Breaking%20With%20G.O.P.%2C%20Top%20Conservative%20Lawyer%20Says%20Trump%20Can%20Stand%20Trial&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2F>
  *   
<https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Breaking%20With%20G.O.P.%2C%20Top%20Conservative%20Lawyer%20Says%20Trump%20Can%20Stand%20Trial%20https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2021%2F02%2F07%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fcharles-cooper-trump-impeachment.html%3Fsmid%3Dwa-share>

Other related posts: