[uupretirees] Re: First amendment

  • From: "hils." <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "bkasprak" for DMARC)
  • To: "uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:10:56 +0000 (UTC)

Maybe th NYT should put this on their masthead "only the news that fits our 
biased narrative" since that is believed by many to be true.
Bob Kasprak========================


-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Russell <ericprussell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, Mar 24, 2021 12:54 pm
Subject: [uupretirees] First amendment

 #yiv0689871310 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}I often question Prof. 
Dershowitz's opinions but, in this case, I agree with him.  Twisting the truth 
to meet a corporate agenda [A couple of examples leap to mind.] has gone too 
far, even if he ignores the most egregious twisters of all in his article.  Eric
Should New York Times v. Sullivan Be Overruled because of The New York Times? 
:: Gatestone Institute

Other related posts: