[torontocbm] Re: C64nic+ on c128

  • From: Leif Bloomquist <leif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "torontocbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <torontocbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:28:08 -0400

New ones are $59 from Jim.

http://store.go4retro.com/64nic/

--
Leif Bloomquist | leif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | +1 416-737-2328 | Check out my
blog! http://www.jammingsignal.com

"Every choice, no matter how small, begins a new story." - xkcd


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Miraglia, Walter <
Walter.Miraglia@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Anyone know what the going rate is for one of these cards… I bought it a
> while ago for use on my C64…
>
> But alas did not really use it…  I do have eproms burnt for it…   J
>
>
>
> *From:* torontocbm-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> torontocbm-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *rob.adlers@xxxxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:22 AM
> *To:* torontocbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; torontocbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject:* [torontocbm] Re: C64nic+ on c128
>
>
>
> I'd still love a irc chat client that doesn't use Geos as a front end....
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
>
> *From: *Leif Bloomquist
>
> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:14 AM
>
> *To: *torontocbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Reply To: *torontocbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject: *[torontocbm] Re: C64nic+ on c128
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm not aware of any 128 mode apps that natively use the RR-Net or
> compatible.
>
>
>
> I've been using my 128 with "regular" DesTerm and a Lantronix UDS-100
> (serial to Ethernet converter) and that works pretty well.
>
>
>
> -Leif
>
>
>
>
>   --
> Leif Bloomquist | leif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | +1 416-737-2328 | Check out my
> blog! http://www.jammingsignal.com
>
> "Every choice, no matter how small, begins a new story." - xkcd
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Dan Kovacs <danielkovacs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Everyone;
>
> Are there any tcp apps that can be used on the 128 in 128 mode?
>  Specifically a telnet client like Kipperterm that runs in 80 column mode?
>
> Google has failed me.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>
>

Other related posts: