I have the Olethreutine book and agree with Hugh--highly recommended. I think the price is $75 at Bioquip. Well worth the expense in my opinion. Merrill On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:21 AM, kjchilds <kjchilds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Based strictly on the pics available on MPG, the markings on Sonia > paraplesiana don't appear to match my moth. > > Ken Childs > Henderson, TN > Chester County > > http://tinyurl.com/Kens-Moths-2011 > > ________________________________ > From: Hugh McGuinness <hdmcguinness@xxxxxxxxx> > To: ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: TN Moths <tn-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 8:59 AM > Subject: [tn-moths] Re: [ncsc-moths] Range info on a couple of Torts > > Hey ALl you Leppers! > > Ken, why isn't your Tort Sonia paraplesiana? (NB: there has been confusion > between this and constrictana, but the current understanding of the latter > taxon is that it is restricted to the Gulf Coast.) > > [To everyone] And BTW do you have Gilligan et al.'s "Olethruetine Moths of > teh mid-western United States"? If you are going to try to ID Torts without > using a museum collection (i.e., by photo), then this guide is a must. It > will set you back about $90, but it is well worth it, and you will probably > dog-ear so badly within a season or two that you will have to buy a second > copy. Seriously, for all the TN and western NC moth-ers, it will probably > cover close to 100% of the Olethreutines you will find, and for east > coasters about 80%. MPG still has a lot of uncertainty associated with the > living shots of Olethreutines, although Bob has worked hard to show a > definitive collection of museum specimens. Here are the highlights: hard > cover; 306 species covered all shown as spread specimens with high quality > photos; a complete genitalic photo library (for those who like moth porn); > ecological and phenolical info; great frontmatter on how to discuss/analyze > pattern in Olethreutines; a larval key, etc. > > You can order the book through this link: > http://www.tortricidae.com/olethreutinebook.asp > > Hugh > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:44 AM, kjchilds <kjchilds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I shot this one a couple of nights ago and based on the plates on MPG, the > most likely suspects are 2946 Phaneta apacheana or 3166 Pelochrista > metariana. Does anyone have range info on these 2 species? I've searched but > not much info is available on either one. There are photos of each by Mark > Dreiling which I think means Oklahoma. His shot of 3166 is backed up by DNA > testing so I'm leaning towards that one. > > http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p193/kjchilds/Moths%202011/Moths%202011%20temporary/IMG_5346.jpg > http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p193/kjchilds/Moths%202011/Moths%202011%20temporary/IMG_5345.jpg > > Ken Childs > Henderson, TN > Chester County > > http://tinyurl.com/Kens-Moths-2011 > > > > > > -- J. Merrill Lynch Echo Valley Farm Watauga County, NC Elevation: 3,400 feet