I've lightened it way up.
From: "spreadwing@xxxxxxx" <spreadwing@xxxxxxx>
To: tn-dragonflies@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 10:44 AM
Subject: [tn-dragonflies] Re: Enallagma
Yes, it’s not the size of the image, it’s the dark background.
Marion DobbsRome (Floyd Co.) GA
"Scientific truth goes through three states: first, people say it conflicts
with the Bible; next, they say it has been discovered before; lastly, they say
they always believed it."_ Louis Agassiz
On Nov 25, 2016, at 11:42 AM, Redacted sender "Rconnorsphoto" for DMARC
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks, Ken. Still not detailed enough for me to say for sure, checking it
against my resource materials. But it does not look like the typical length of
projection (long) on terminal appendages of Familiar Bluet, it does look short,
if not being fooled by the dark background. And the occipital bar is visible
and obvious, at least. Best I can do. Maybe it is Atlantic, but you might look
for it next year to get really good shots; maybe in-hand close ups if possible.
Richard In a message dated 11/25/2016 10:21:27 A.M. Central Standard Time,
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Here's a larger version.
From: "dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tn-dragonflies@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 10:15 AM
Subject: [tn-dragonflies] Re: Enallagma
Ken, That size is not enough detail for me to judge, having not seen E.
doubledayi, Atlantic Bluet, before myself. But if Marion thinks it looks good
for it, I'd suggest you send a larger file to Odonata Central and submit as
such. They might want a specimen eventually, but it might be a state record.
Richard In a message dated 11/25/2016 10:06:31 A.M. Central Standard Time,
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Here's a slightly larger version and if necessary, I can dig out the
original.
From: "dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tn-dragonflies@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 9:13 AM
Subject: [tn-dragonflies] Re: Enallagma
Hi Ken, If you could attach or post a link to a larger file to study
details, it would help. I couldn't enlarge the image at BugGuide. Would be neat
if it's a new area record. Richard C Nashville In a message dated
11/24/2016 8:54:00 P.M. Central Standard Time, dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
writes:
Someone in-the-know please take a look at this record on BG. It was
originally ID'd as Enallagma civile but someone is questioning that ID.
http://bugguide.net/node/view/1193670#2284452 Ken Childs
Beech Bluff, TN
Madison County
http://tinyurl.com/Lepidoptera-of-Western-TN
http://www.finishflagfarms.com
Attachment:
IMG_3344b.jpg
Description: JPEG image
