[THIN] Re: What is the best strategy for change management on Citrix
- From: "Jensen, Jay" <jjensen@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:05:05 -0500
We use IM on our XPe Farm. It works great for us. We have monthly updates
on many of our applications and we schedule the package uninstall and
install of the package during the night and so far (knock on wood) we have
had no problems with this set up. IM (was formally called IMS in MetaFrame
1.8 days) was done very well in XP platform. I would not given a nickel to
use the old 1.8 IMS system but XP IM is sweet.
That is my recommendation.
Jay
-----Original Message-----
From: Raymond Leung [mailto:tungyuen02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:57 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] What is the best strategy for change management on Citrix
We have a MF XP farm running more than 15 servers to serve a new application
in the company. However, we can forsee some regular minor or major upgrades
for that application.
What is the best strategy for change management? To keep applying
application updates and patches on the current setup ? or save / restore a
clean image by ghost for each server ( with W2k, metaframe XP installed )
and install new version of application from there? Is there any document for
reference ?
Best regards
Raymond
Other related posts:
