[THIN] Re: Using a modem in PS4.0

  • From: "Steve Greenberg" <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:52:55 -0700

Would a plain old "modem on COM1" be TAPI? Or is TAPI only when you are
doing some kind of voice mail, telephony, or specialized application?
 

Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd. suite D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
(602) 296-0411 fax
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



 

  _____  

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Carl Stalhood
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:26 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Using a modem in PS4.0



COM port mapping is not TAPI-compatible. TAPI devices cannot be mapped to
client COM ports. 

http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX384590
<http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX384590&searchID=10421130>
&searchID=10421130 

 

  _____  

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Steve Greenberg
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 3:50 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Using a modem in PS4.0

 

That's right. I thought the original poster was talking about sticking a
modem on the server COM port. A blurb from the admin guide shoud help:

 

Client Serial Port Mapping 

 

Client COM port mapping allows a remote application running on the server to
access devices attached to COM ports on the client device. Client COM ports
are not automatically mapped to server ports at logon, but can be mapped
manually using the net use or change client commands. See "MetaFrame
Presentation Server Commands" on page 323 for more information about the
change client command. For more information about client COM port mapping,
see the Administrator's Guides for the clients you plan to deploy. 

 

 

I have never done this will PNAgent, but in PN there is a menu option for
modems which shows the install modems on the client system. These become
available to the users server side session as client network devices, but
need to be mapped to be used by the application running on the server

 

 

Regards,

 

Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd. suite D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
(602) 296-0411 fax
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

  _____  

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Jeff Pitsch
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 1:33 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Using a modem in PS4.0

You need to manually map the com ports as well.

On 10/27/05, Evan Mann <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 

I just need 1 user to use their local modem on their local com port, with
ADP running through Citrix via PNAgent accessing that modem. The driver for
the modem is built into 2003 Server (what I run Citrix on).  Same driver
used on XP machines. 

 

I need to have COM port mappings enabled in policies.  Do I need to do
anything else?


 

  _____  

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:  <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Greenberg
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:41 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Using a modem in PS4.0

 

If you mean outgoing using a modem for outgoing dial, you can connect the
modem to a COM port and simply let the user access it directly. If you need
to pool the modem or share it across the network then you would need
something like SpartaCom which handles contention for ports and can
re-direct the COM session over IP. 

 

Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd. suite D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
(602) 296-0411 fax
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

  _____  

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:  <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Evan Mann
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 11:27 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Using a modem in PS4.0

 

Is there anything special about getting a modem to work under PS4.0?  I have
an HR person trying to do manual checks in ADP PC/Payroll and it requires a
modem.  I'm using a USRobotics External 56k, something very old and generic.






 

Other related posts: