[THIN] Re: Tarantella
- From: "Claudio Rodrigues" <crodrigues@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:25:40 -0400
Nice product. You can get a fully functional demo directly off their
website.
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jason Patten
Sent: June 24, 2004 10:19 AM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Re: Tarantella
I was referring to the Canaveral IQ. The new one. We are
looking at implementing it on Server 2003.
-----Original Message-----
From: Claudio Rodrigues
[mailto:crodrigues@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 10:10 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Tarantella
I used it many times (If you mean Canaveral IQ that was
New Moon's product) and I do like it. In some aspects Citrix is trying
to catch up to them.
If you mean the old Tarantella product, Unix based, I
also used and still think it is useless.
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jason Patten
Sent: June 23, 2004 2:38 PM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Tarantella
Is Tarantella a Good alternative to Citrix? Or
are there any major offsetting disadvantages to it?
670,616,629 mph. Its not just a good idea, its
the law.
Other related posts:
