[THIN] RE: [THIN] Re: Speaking of VM...
- From: Evan Mann <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:38:15 -0400
I found it to be extremely easy! I never touched ESX before and had
VM's up and P2V's (using VMWare P2V) in under 1 hour (not counting the
P2V time itself), after it installed. I didn't need to go to the shell
for any of it (granted I am familiar with Linux systems, but didn't need
to use that knowledge to get running)
I think the most confusing part up the install is partitioning. The
defaults from the ESX 2.5.2 installer are just not good and far from
optimal. I read some posts on VMTN Forums to get the right info. I
hear the ESX 3 installer will have actually optimal partition sizing
defaults based on your total disk space.
There's been some stuff I've had to do in shell because of need to edit
VMX files, or to untar an update and run it, but the install notes make
it really easy to follow to do that. I could see someone using ESX, in
production, and never needing to touch the shell.
Disclaimer: I haven't had to setup a SAN (or NAS in ESX 3) just yet, so
I can't speak for what think can't be done for that in the web
interface.
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Tom Howarth
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 12:10 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Speaking of VM...
in a word yes, but it is a fairly steep learning curve. as it has the
look and feel of UNIX. that said you can do the majority of admin tasks
via their web based admin tool. I have have just installed a two node
DL380 dual proc/dual core server attached to a MSA1000. it is currently
hosting six servers at more that adequate speed (ie. no users
complaints;-D) and both nodes are not even breathing heavy never mind
sweating.
In my humble opinion it rocks
On 22/06/06, Roger Riggins <roger.riggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does ESX blow away the other VMWare versions in performance?
I've installed VMWare Workstation just to test it and it's slower than
molasses. Of course I don't have any training and haven't wrenched on it
a whole lot, but the VMs truly are slow, especially if I try to get more
than two running. I have it running on newer server hardware. :/
Thanks,
Roger Riggins
Network Administrator
Lutheran Services in Iowa
w: 319.859.3543
c: 319.290.5687
http://www.lsiowa.org <http://www.lsiowa.org/>
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joe Shonk
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:19 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Which way to go...
I'm surprised no one has mentioned Virtuozzo... VMWare is
great, but if majority of the stuff is W2k3 and/or linux, why
virtualize the hardware when you only need to virtualize the OS.
Joe
On 6/22/06, Selinger, Stephen < SSelinger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I couldn't agree more. It is truly amazing how many server run
at 5% all
day every day. If you are refreshing a bunch of servers the ROI
on
VMWARE ESX Server is an easy sell. Let me know if you need
more
details as I could go on and on...:)
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Evan Mann
Sent: June 21, 2006 8:48 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] RE: [THIN] Re: Which way to go...
I'd go with 2 dual-core processors as well. To be honest, when
I think
server, I don't even think single CPU these days, it doesn't
even pop
into my head. Dual-core is just a bonus on top of it all.
With that in mind, I have a lot of servers that are largely
wasted with
two single-core 2.8-3.2ghz Xeon processors.. But, that's why we
are
going into into server consolidation with VMWare, it solves the
wasted
hardware problem for most (not all) wasted resources.
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On
Behalf Of Adam.Baum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 7:04 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Which way to go...
Assume everything. We're looking at a technology refresh and we
tend to
choose one standard model to purchase for the bulk of our
servers.
adam
"Selinger,
Stephen"
< SSelinger@xxxxxx <mailto:SSelinger@xxxxxx>
To
.ca> <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by:
cc
thin-bounce@freel
ists.org <http://ists.org/>
Subject
[THIN] Re: Which way to
go...
06/21/2006 03:22
PM
Please respond to
thin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
g
It really depends on what the role of the server is going to be?
I am
assuming a Citrix server?
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On
Behalf Of Adam.Baum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: June 21, 2006 3:09 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Which way to go...
All,
If you were buying new server, would you go a dual CPU setup or
a single
dual-core? Why? I am specing out our new server platform.
I've read
all sorts of benchmarks and such, but they all tend to pit a
dual core
vs a single CPU. Not quite a fair matchup.
adam
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or
Vacation
mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to
which it
is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal and or
privileged
information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the
intended
recipient. Do not copy, distribute or take action relying on
it. Any
communication received in error, or subsequent reply, should be
deleted
or destroyed.
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or
Vacation
mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or
Vacation
mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
Lutheran Services in Iowa Confidentiality Notice
==================================================================
The information contained in this communication may be
confidential,
is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above,
and
may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not
the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its
contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please return it to the sender
immediately
and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer
system. If you have any questions concerning this message,
please
contact the sender.
--
Tom at home
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] RE: [THIN] Re: Speaking of VM...
