[THIN] Re: Servers for PS 4.0

  • From: "Roger Riggins" <roger.riggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:04:05 -0500

 

It really depends on what you're running. We use mostly Office and IE,
but run 99% of our apps in Citrix. We average 20-25 users per server. On
10 minute sample intervals from 8:00am to 5:00pm today we had an average
proc utilization of <20% and peaked at about 40%. Average memory
utilization was 55% and peaked at 62%. These are dual 3.x 2850s with 4GB
RAM. 

 

From what I've tested, we can get about 40 people on a server before I
notice performance degradation in a session. 

 

Good luck!

Roger Riggins   
Network Administrator 
Lutheran Services in Iowa 
w: 319.859.3543 
c: 319.290.5687 
http://www.lsiowa.org 

  

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Beckett, William (Bill)
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 1:56 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Servers for PS 4.0

 

For anyone running Dells, specifically the 2850's... 

 

Do you find that the dual procs with decent memory (4GB) runs
Presentation Server 4.0 well? User load 50-60 users on one box. We have
older 6450 poweredge units that have quad processors and I'm a little
concerned about dropping down to dual. Do the 2850's do the job just
fine?

<b>Lutheran Services in Iowa Confidentiality Notice
==================================================================</b>
<red>The information contained in this communication may be confidential,
is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above, and
may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its
contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please return it to the sender immediately
and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer
system. If you have any questions concerning this message, please
contact the sender.</red>

Other related posts: