[THIN] Re: Secure Gateway Capacity Planning
- From: Michel Roth <mrdizzz@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 14:50:05 +0100
More info: Citrix Access Gateway (CAG) Capacity
Planning<http://www.thincomputing.net/newsitem1367.html>
2006/2/8, Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> It all depends on what your looking for. If they only want secure
> external access to ICA traffic only, then CSG is the way to go. If they
> want the extra features of a full blown SSL VPN, the CAG is the way. It
> always comes down to business requirements.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On 2/8/06, Edward VanDewars <evandewars@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > But if he goes to a CAG he'll have to buy licenses for that, too -
> > right? 1,000 x $75+/ea. = ouch!
> >
> >
> > On 2/7/06, Joe Shonk < joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> > >
> > > 1000-2000 concurrent users on a modern box... I would look at using
> > > CAG instead...
> > >
> > > Joe
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/7/06, Mark Schill <meson3902@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone have any documents or info concerning how many users a
> > > > CSG server can support?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Other related posts:
