Purely as a side-interest, I've been personally running Windows 7 without a page file for the last month with no ill effects (8GB RAM). Performance has felt snappier. But then I don't have 40-70 users connecting to me :) From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Foster, Bill Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 7:14 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Swap file recommendations You could argue and fail in practical usage scenarios. I disagree with the no page file option. Without a properly sized page file your server will eventually give you the low virtual memory warnings and performance will seriously suffer. By running without a page file you prevent the OS from properly managing memory. Bill Foster From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Wood Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 9:33 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Swap file recommendations I'd agree with that - in fact - you could argue that you don't need a pagefile at all but I've never got round to testing that :? Fwiw just to go back to Jeremy's point - I've seen servers that were maxing out 30-40 users when running Standard edition. Essentially the servers were maxing out the 4GB of memory. Upgrading to Enterprise and adding additional memory (going from 4 to 12GB) enabled those same servers to host 60-70 users. Granted Enterprise costs more than Standard - but essentially we almost doubled the number of users on the server for the cost of an enterprise license without adding more h/w. From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeremy Saunders Sent: 01 March 2010 09:49 To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Swap file recommendations Hi Angela, Yeah....way too big. You will often find that even with a 4GB pages file, it's usage is only 30 - 40%, so why create larger ones? Run up Perf Mon and check the pagefile usage under load. Personally, I start with a 4GB pagefile, and cut back from there. None of your "client" apps will be PAE aware...not even the MS Office Suite. Like I said the extra addressable memory will only be used by the system as virtual memory. Cheers, Jeremy. From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Angela Smith Sent: Monday, 1 March 2010 3:59 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Swap file recommendations Hi I have PAE enabled and we have no issues with the Applications working in this mode. I have set the "write debugging information" option to kernel memory dump. I have set the pagefile to 10GB but am concerned its too big or may have a performance impact. Is there any issues with leaving the swap at 10GB? Is performance impacted as the file is bigger? Regards Angela ________________________________ From: stefan.timmermans@xxxxxxxxx To: angela_smith9@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [THIN] Re: Swap file recommendations Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:45:06 +0100 Angela, The PAE switch is ok, if the apps (or at least some ) are PAE aware (kind of > 32bit but less then a real 64 bit environment), so this might be limitted to MS apps addressing above the 4GB barrier (maybe Oracle ? anyone an idea on that ? or does Oracle have its own memory manager as some SAP products do ??) Paging beyond 4096MB requires several volumes as there is an limit imposed per volume of 4096MB (but there is a backdoor to create separate folders for every pagefile) http://support.microsoft.com/kb/237740 Regards, Stefan ________________________________ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeremy Saunders Sent: zondag 28 februari 2010 17:42 To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Swap file recommendations That's not 100% correct Nick. Using Enterprise Edition you can enable /PAE in the boot.ini so that the "System" will see all the RAM. No apps will be able to address the memory above 4GB, but the System will use it as virtual memory. There have been many studies done that say that this will provide a considerable performance boost. I would still start with a 4GB page file, but you may be able to decrease this or remove it altogether. However, if you still want to enable kernel memory dumps, leave an 850MB page file on the System drive. You would never do a full memory dump! Cheers, Jeremy. From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nick Smith Sent: Sunday, 28 February 2010 8:32 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Swap file recommendations The x86 OS will only see 3gb Ram in any case so you don't need to worry too much. On 28 Feb 2010, at 04:07, "Angela Smith" <angela_smith9@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:angela_smith9@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Hi Im building new Windows 2003 Enterprise servers with XenApp 4.5 (32 bit). Servers have 16Gb RAM. Hardware was originally sized for x64 but we must go with x86. How big should the swap file be if server has 16Gb RAM? If I follow the RAM X 1.5 rule I will end up with a 24GB swap which seems like overkill. I have the disk space but was wondering what the best practice is or if there are dissadvantages in using a large swapfile. Thanks Angela ________________________________ Browse profiles for free! View photos of singles in your area. ________________________________ SUBJECT TO CONTRACT ________________________________ Confidentiality and Privilege Notice This document is intended solely for the named addressee. The information contained in the pages is confidential and contains legally privileged information. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone, and you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you. ________________________________ ________________________________ Browse profiles for free! View photos of singles in your area.<http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/> ________________________________ Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to rent, share or buy?<http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157631292/direct/01/> ________________________________ Confidentiality and Privilege Notice This document is intended solely for the named addressee. The information contained in the pages is confidential and contains legally privileged information. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone, and you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you. ________________________________ Privacy Notice: This electronic mail message, and any attachments, are confidential and are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain information that is proprietary and that may be Individually Identifiable or Protected Health Information under HIPAA. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately contact the sender by telephone, or by email, and destroy all copies of this message. If you are a regular recipient of our electronic mail, please notify us promptly if you change your email address. ________________________________ SUBJECT TO CONTRACT