[THIN] Re: Independent tests (was Re: Virus protection)
- From: "John Carlson" <johnc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:03:10 -0600
Well, I can arrange a 30 day trial for anyone who would like to try it
on their own.
I too have the pleasure of working on basically every brand of AV being
a consultant. Mostly I see Symantec, McAfee and Sophos. Personally I
would use Sophos over the others simply because of the performance
difference. It does not seem to impact the system resources as much and
scans much faster than the others.
I do agree that comfort level is an important part. I hardly recommend
any software or hardware that I have not had some personal experience
with.
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ryan Lambert
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 8:38 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Independent tests (was Re: Virus protection)
In my experience, I've had pretty much every brand of antivirus I've
used find something the other has not, and vice versa.
Norton, Sophos, Trend, Panda, McAfee... the list just goes on... I try
to stay away from Igotknockedup IT (InoculateIT CA), though.
Basically, why would anyone trying to sell a product say theirs wasn't
better than a competitor? It would be selling suicide not to. Personally
I prefer either McAfee, Sophos, or Trend... I couldn't tell you why,
though. It's just what I'm comfortable with. That's probably what it
boils down to anymore. That and incident/virus response.
-----Original Message-----
From: Euan Cooper [mailto:Euan.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 3:13 PM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Independent tests (was Re: Virus protection)
Just how "independent" is this test when the second line says
Test report prepared under contract from Sophos Anti-Virus
While I don't want to "bag" Sophos as I have not direct knowledge of the
product[1] I bet with a bit of looking I could find similar
"independent" tests showing most of the major anti virus software
vendor's products favourably against their rivals.
Reminds me of an internal MS video presentation on NT3.5 I once saw - a
question was asked about how NT was going to win against Novell. One of
the key points was that any time anyone was running a comparison of NT
against any other NOS NT had to win - MS had a team whose sole job was
to make sure this happened.
I agree with Roger on this - AV software is pretty much a Ford vs
Holden[2] thing. I would go so far as to say that no AV software in
itself is not enough to completely protect your network anyway.
-Ec
1 though I have heard good things about it
2 Localised for NZ
-----Original Message-----
From: John Carlson [mailto:johnc@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, 29 January 2004 6:39 a.m.
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Virus protection
Absolutely there is a difference. I had a client who was running
Symantec Corporate and experiencing odd behavior on his network. I told
him it sounded like a virus and he assured me his AV software was up to
date. I set him up with a 30 day demo of Sophos and upon scanning his
network drives he found viruses in the first folder it scanned. Viruses
that Symantec had missed. It was the easiest sale I ever made.
Don't just take my word for it. Here is an independent test
comparing Sophos to the majors:
http://www.veritest.com/clients/reports/sophos/sophos_antivirus.pdf
________________________________
From: Roger Riggins [mailto:roger.riggins@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 11:28 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Virus protection
It's the difference between a Ford and a Chevy. Everyone is
going to have different experiences with the products in their
environment.
Personally, if I was trying to decide between AV apps I'd stick
to the biggest... McAfee and Symantec. For what it's worth, I used many
products when I was a consultant and found Symantec to have the best
product. Like I said though... Ford and Chevy. It's whatever works for
you.
R
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robinson, Nick
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 11:14 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Virus protection
A little off subject but.... I'm currently using McAfee for my
domain and users virus protection and now someone is telling me Sophos
is better. Anyone here use Sophos and can make an argument for either
McAfee or Sophos? I like McAfee but maybe its not the best.
TIA
Nick
Notice of Confidentiality:
This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged and/or
confidential information. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the
intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any
copying, distribution, dissemination or action taken in relation to the
contents of this e-mail and any of its attachments is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the
original e-mail and destroy any copies or printouts of this e-mail as
well as any attachments. Please note Lutheran Services in Iowa does not
endorse any opinions, conclusions or other information contained within
this message that does not pertain to official business.
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System. For more information on a proactive email security
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
Other related posts:
