[THIN] Re: Highly Available 4.5 AAC/CAG setup

  • From: "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:35:15 -0700

What's the specific issue with load balancing WI?   We've pretty much setup
the same configuration for a customer but used Citrix Netscalers instead of
Cisco CSS.

Joe

On 1/9/07, J. Henske <jen.work@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


We are trying to put in 2 CAGs, 2 AAC boxes with 2 WI servers.  They are
all version 4.5 and we are trying to utilize cisco loadbalancing VIPs for
each pair.  Having issues with the multiple WI boxes, if we use a VIP, it
fails but we can point to just one of the WI servers.

I was thinking it would be better to put the WI on the AAC boxes.  Then we
wouldn't have to worry about load balancing the WI.

Any suggestions?  Citrix is mocking up our environment to try and help,
any ideas would be appreciated.


Thanks!
Jennifer Henske
Mercy Health Systems
St. Louis,  MO

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. thin
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2007