[THIN] Re: EdgeSight 4.5
- From: "Andrew Wood" <andrew.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 21:59:19 +0100
Thanks for that Jeremy; I was already on the case; i'll post up tomorrow the
install script once i've got it tested :)
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Jeremy Saunders
Sent: 06 August 2007 20:50
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: EdgeSight 4.5
Thanks for the heads up on that one Andrew...Got a 4.5 install to do next
week.
To automate the the registry change use SetACL.exe, and to automate the
DCOM change use DCOMperm.exe. I have an example here, as Conf Manager 4.0
had the same problems:
http://www.jhouseconsulting.com/articles/conferencing_manager_4.0_deployment_script.html
Cheers.
Kind regards,
Jeremy Saunders
Senior Technical Specialist
Infrastructure Technology Services
(ITS) & Cerulean
Global Technology Services (GTS)
IBM Australia
Level 1, 1060 Hay Street
West Perth WA 6005
Postal: PO Box 525, West Perth WA
6872
Visit us at
http://www.ibm.com/services/au/its
P: +61 8 9261 8412 F: +61 8 9261 8486
P: (Reception) +61 8 9261 8420 E-mail:
M: TBA jeremy.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Andrew Wood"
<andrew.wood@gilw
ood-cs.co.uk> To
Sent by: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
thin-bounce@freel cc
ists.org
Subject
[THIN] Re: EdgeSight 4.5
06/08/2007 11:35
PM
Please respond to
thin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
g
As an addition for 4.5 I have come across this:
http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX113898
which is going to be a pain for the client’s automated deployments L
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Andrew Wood
Sent: 06 August 2007 12:27
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: EdgeSight 4.5
I think the problem with vendors who advocate using SQL is that they don’t
think through the implications of their ‘user’ and setup functions. Imo the
installation instructions pretty much come from the developer straight to
you, and sadly no developer is going to faff about getting the security
settings locked down which is dull and tedious when he can be messing about
having fun getting the alarms to go ‘ping’ in 14 different tones and add an
asteroids easter egg to a hidden sub menu.
<slaps head> and ... Systrack was another that I’ve used in the past – they
originally wrote the RM component. Although it looked a little dated when I
last installed it Systrack is a good solid product with a lot of reports
which are very useful out of the box; black box recording is pretty neat .
Good price point as well iirc .. Obviously worth adding to an eval list.
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Malcolm Bruton
Sent: 03 August 2007 19:15
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: EdgeSight 4.5
Thanks Andrew
Deployed with 2000 SQL with difficulty. Our internal standards for SQL 2005
is 64 bit and didn’t have a dev box capable of this. Does not seem a grown
up product just yet and the security standards meant a few headaches. Why
is it that vendors love you to use SA or admin rights?
Believe it was 4.5 we deployed for eval.
Interestingly enough I had a phone call from a vendor after this.
Mentioned your name I believe....Wasn’t one of the ones you listed
below....
Malcolm
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Andrew Wood
Sent: 03 August 2007 18:42
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: EdgeSight 4.2
Use 2005 rather than 2000 for the SQL back end; If you are going to use
2005 Express edition (as its an eval) be aware there is no scheduling
component so the scheduling in, and you’ll have to hand edit some config
files to get the sql reporting to work.
Bear in mind that 4.5 is out now.
Its pretty impressive stuff – but if I was doing an eval I’d also look at
the likes at RTO’s PinPoint if you’re a small/medium sized organisation –
or EG Enterprise Suite and Performance guard from primetech if you’re a
medium/large.
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Malcolm Bruton
Sent: 03 August 2007 14:04
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] EdgeSight 4.2
Is anyone using Edgesight?
What do you think of it. Is it any good? Doing an Evaluation and not
terrible impressed so far. Wondered what other people thought.
Malcolm����b��I+hR{.n�+����� �&ޢ� �8�z�h�V�jب�j z� ��zZ0�)��i��0���zX���+��b���
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
Other related posts:
