[THIN] Re: CAG to WI
- From: "Chad Schneider (IT)" <Chad.M.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:11:33 -0600
I thought so, but wanted to be sure.
Thanks!
>>> On 1/8/2008 at 11:09 AM, <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The session between the user and the CAG is SSL encrypted regardless of what
passes through it. The session between the WI and the PS farm is not encrypted
by default but can be by adding certificates to these servers and requiring a
secure connection. Usually the WI and PS are on the LAN and this not a concern.
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85266
(602) 432-8649
www.thinclient.net
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Chad Schneider (IT)
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 9:24 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] CAG to WI
If I have users connect to a CAG, then use WI to connect to published
applications, are those applications then protected in an SSL tunnel? I am
concerned that they are simply unprotected ICA traffic on the internet.
ChadSchneider
Systems Engineer
ThedaCare IT
920-735-7615
Other related posts:
